首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine >Rethinking the withholding/withdrawing distinction: the cultural construction of life-support and the framing of end-of-life decisions
【2h】

Rethinking the withholding/withdrawing distinction: the cultural construction of life-support and the framing of end-of-life decisions

机译:重新考虑保留/退出的区别:生命支持的文化建构和生命周期决定的框架

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper is a theoretical and empirically informed examination of the naturalist distinction between withholding and withdrawing life-support.Drawing on the history of mechanical ventilation and on a recent Israeli law containing a novel approach to disconnecting life-support at the end of life, it is argued that the design of machines predicates the division line between “active” and “passive” interventions, and that the distinction itself might be morally self-defeating.Informed by insights from moral psychology, behavioral economics and philosophies of technology, the paper warns against the placement of this old distinction at the heart of the moral and legal regulation of life-support at the end of life.
机译:本文是对自然主义者在扣留和撤回生命支持之间的区别进行的理论和实证研究,借鉴了机械通风的历史以及以色列最近的一项法律,其中包含了一种在生命终结时断开生命支持的新颖方法,有人认为,机器的设计预示了“主动”干预与“被动”干预之间的分界线,并且这种区分本身可能在道德上是自欺欺人的。论文警告道,来自道德心理学,行为经济学和技术哲学反对将这种古老的区分置于生命之末生命维持的道德和法律法规的核心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号