首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Lippincott Williams Wilkins Open Access >Methodological challenges in indirect treatment comparisons: spotlight on a recent comparison of long-acting injectable aripiprazole versus paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of schizophrenia
【2h】

Methodological challenges in indirect treatment comparisons: spotlight on a recent comparison of long-acting injectable aripiprazole versus paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of schizophrenia

机译:间接治疗比较中的方法学挑战:关注长效可注射阿立哌唑与帕潘立酮棕榈酸酯在精神分裂症治疗中的近期比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In a recent study, an indirect treatment comparison was performed to examine the relative efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole once monthly and paliperidone palmitate once monthly. The authors concluded that the results may suggest relative advantages for aripiprazole once monthly over paliperidone palmitate once monthly in the short-term treatment of schizophrenia. However, the validity of the study is compromised as an indirect treatment comparison using extant data may violate important assumptions. Other methodological issues identified further highlight the challenges of performing indirect treatment comparisons.
机译:在最近的研究中,进行了间接治疗比较,以检查阿立哌唑每月一次和帕潘立酮棕榈酸酯一次的相对疗效和耐受性。作者得出的结论是,在精神分裂症的短期治疗中,阿立哌唑每月一次优于帕潘立酮棕榈酸酯一次相对优势。然而,该研究的有效性受到损害,因为使用现有数据进行的间接治疗比较可能违反重要的假设。确定的其他方法学问题进一步凸显了进行间接治疗比较的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号