首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Veterinary Science >A novel low-cost method for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis DNA extraction from an automated broth culture system for real-time PCR analysis
【2h】

A novel low-cost method for Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis DNA extraction from an automated broth culture system for real-time PCR analysis

机译:一种新的低成本方法用于鸟分枝杆菌亚种。从自动化肉汤培养系统中提取副结核病DNA进行实时PCR分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PCR is a highly accurate technique for confirming the presence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (Map) in broth culture. In this study, a simple, efficient, and low-cost method of harvesting DNA from Map cultured in liquid medium was developed. The proposed protocol (Universidad Austral de Chile [UACH]) was evaluated by comparing its performance to that of two traditional techniques (a QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit and cethyltrimethylammonium bromide [CTAB] method). The results were statistically assessed by agreement analysis for which differences in the number of cycles to positive (CP) were compared by Student's t-test for paired samples and regression analysis. Twelve out of 104 fecal pools cultured were positive. The final PCR results for 11 samples analyzed with the QIAamp and UACH methods or ones examined with the QIAamp and CTAB methods were in agreement. Complete (100%) agreement was observed between data from the CTAB and UACH methods. CP values for the UACH and CTAB techniques were not significantly different, while the UACH method yielded significantly lower CP values compared to the QIAamp kit. The proposed extraction method combines reliability and efficiency with simplicity and lower cost.
机译:PCR是用于确认鸟分枝杆菌亚种存在的高精度技术。肉汤培养中的副结核病(地图)。在这项研究中,开发了一种简单,有效且低成本的方法,用于从液体培养基中培养的Map中提取DNA。通过将其与两种传统技术(QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit和乙基三甲基溴化铵[CTAB]方法)的性能进行比较,评估了拟议的协议(智利南方大学[UACH])的性能。通过协议分析对结果进行统计评估,通过配对样本的学生t检验和回归分析比较了阳性循环数(CP)的差异。培养的104个粪便池中有12个呈阳性。用QIAamp和UACH方法分析的11个样品或用QIAamp和CTAB方法检查的11个样品的最终PCR结果一致。在CTAB和UACH方法的数据之间观察到完全(100%)一致。与QIAamp试剂盒相比,UACH和CTAB技术的CP值没有显着差异,而UACH方法产生的CP值明显较低。所提出的提取方法结合了可靠性和效率以及简单性和较低的成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号