首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Ophthalmology >Two-Dimensional Cutting (TDC) Vitrectome: In Vitro Flow Assessment and Prospective Clinical Study Evaluating Core Vitrectomy Efficiency versus Standard Vitrectome
【2h】

Two-Dimensional Cutting (TDC) Vitrectome: In Vitro Flow Assessment and Prospective Clinical Study Evaluating Core Vitrectomy Efficiency versus Standard Vitrectome

机译:二维切割(TDC)玻璃体切割器:体外血流评估和评估核心玻璃体切除术效率与标准玻璃体切割器的前瞻性临床研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose. To evaluate comparative aspiration flow performance and also vitrectomy operating time efficiency using a double-cutting open port vitreous cutting system incorporated in a two-dimensional cutting (TDC, DORC International) vitrectome design versus standard vitreous cutter. Methods. In vitro investigations compared aspiration flow rates in artificial vitreous humor at varying cutter speeds and vacuum levels using a TDC vitrectome and a standard vitrectome across different aspiration pump systems. A prospective single-centre clinical study evaluated duration of core vitrectomy in 80 patients with macular pucker undergoing 25-gauge or 27-gauge vitrectomy using either a TDC vitrectome at 16,000 cuts per minute (cpm) or standard single-cut vitrectome, combined with a Valve Timing intelligence (VTi) pump system (EVA, DORC International). Results. Aspiration flow rates remained constant independent of TDC vitrectome cut rate, while flow rates decreased linearly at higher cutter speeds using a classic single-blade vitrectome. Mean duration of core vitrectomy surgeries using a TDC vitreous cutter system was significantly (p < 0.001) shorter than the mean duration of core vitrectomy procedures using a single-cut vitrectome of the same diameter (reduction range, 34%–50%). Conclusion. Vitrectomy surgery performed using a TDC vitrectome was faster than core vitrectomy utilizing a standard single-action vitrectome at similar cut speeds.
机译:目的。为了评估比较的抽吸流性能以及玻璃体切割手术的时间效率,使用了与标准玻璃体切割器相结合的二维切割(TDC,DORC International)玻璃体切割设计中采用的双切割开孔玻璃体切割系统。方法。体外研究比较了TDC玻璃体切割器和标准玻璃体切割器在不同的抽吸泵系统上在不同切刀速度和真空水平下人工玻璃体液中的抽吸流速。一项前瞻性单中心临床研究评估了80例接受25规或27规玻璃体切除术的黄斑皱patients患者的玻璃体玻璃体切除术的持续时间,使用TDC vitrectome每分钟切割量(cpm)或标准单切口玻璃体切除术结合气门正时智能(VTi)泵系统(EVA,DORC International)。结果。抽吸流量保持恒定,与TDC玻璃体切除术的切割率无关,而使用传统的单叶片玻璃体切除器,在更高的切刀速度下,流速线性下降。使用TDC玻璃体切割器系统进行玻璃体切除术的平均时间显着(p <0.001)短于使用相同直径的单切口玻璃体切除术的玻璃体切除术的平均持续时间(缩小范围为34%–50%)。结论。使用TDC玻璃体切除术进行的玻璃体切除术手术比采用标准单作用玻璃体切除术的核心玻璃体切除术以相似的切割速度更快。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号