首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the Japanese Physical Therapy Association >Comparison of Four Physiotherapy Regimens in the Treatment of Long-Term Mechanical Low Back Pain
【2h】

Comparison of Four Physiotherapy Regimens in the Treatment of Long-Term Mechanical Low Back Pain

机译:四种物理疗法对长期机械性下腰痛治疗的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: This study compared efficacy of combinations of Back Muscles Endurance Exercise (BMEE) and McKenzie Exercise (ME) and McKenzie Back Care Education (MBE) in the management of long term mechanical Low Back Pain (LBP). Subjects and Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled comparative trial was employed. Seventy three participants mean age 45.3 ± 8.1 years were recruited for the study but only 53 completed the study. Participants in group A were treated with a combination of BMEE, ME and MBE. Group B: A combination BMEE and MBE. Group C: A combination of ME and MBE. Group D: MBE only. Participants were seen thrice weekly for 8 weeks. They were measured for pain intensity, lumbar flexibility, activities limitation and self esteem. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics of F-test. Significance was set at 0.05 alpha-level. Results: At the end of the study, the four treatment groups had significant reduction in pain intensity p<0.05. Post hoc analysis showed groups A, B, and C had significantly greater reduction than D, and groups A and C had significantly greater reduction than B. Groups A, B and C also had significant improvement in activities limitation p<0.05. Post hoc analysis showed groups A, B and C had significantly greater improvement than D, and group B significantly greater improvement than C. Conclusion: Combination physiotherapy regimens proved effective in the management of long- term mechanical LBP. Regimen A is recommended in managing long-term mechanical LBP.
机译:目的:本研究比较了背部肌肉耐力锻炼(BMEE)和麦肯齐锻炼(ME)以及麦肯齐背部护理教育(MBE)组合在长期机械性下腰痛(LBP)管理中的功效。受试者和方法:采用单盲随机对照比较试验。该研究招募了73名平均年龄45.3±8.1岁的参与者,但只有53名完成了这项研究。 A组参与者接受了BMEE,ME和MBE的联合治疗。 B组:BMEE和MBE的组合。 C组:ME和MBE的组合。 D组:仅MBE。每周三次观察参与者,共8周。他们测量了疼痛强度,腰部柔韧性,活动受限和自尊。使用F检验的描述性和推论统计分析数据。显着性设定为0.05 alpha水平。结果:在研究结束时,四个治疗组的疼痛强度明显降低,p <0.05。事后分析显示,A,B和C组的减少幅度明显大于D,A和C组的减少幅度明显大于B。A,B和C组的活动极限也有明显改善,p <0.05。事后分析显示,A,B和C组的改善显着大于D,B组的改善显着大于C。结论:联合理疗方案被证明可有效治疗长期机械性LBP。建议在长期机械性LBP管理中采用方案A。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号