首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics >The rebar repair for radial meniscus tears: a biomechanical comparison of a reinforced suture repair versus parallel and cross-stitch techniques
【2h】

The rebar repair for radial meniscus tears: a biomechanical comparison of a reinforced suture repair versus parallel and cross-stitch techniques

机译:radial骨半月板撕裂的钢筋修复:加固缝线修复与平行和十字绣技术的生物力学比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundRadial meniscus tears can cause the meniscus to be completely incompetent. This serious type of meniscus tear can be difficult to repair. Techniques have been developed that juxtapose the meniscus tear edges and are able to withstand high loads. The purpose of this study was to determine the load to failure of a reinforced suture bar repair (Rebar Repair) for radial meniscus tear and compare it to the parallel suture technique and cross-stitch technique and to compare mode of failure among all three groups. The hypothesis was that the Rebar Repair will have a higher load to failure than both the parallel technique and the cross-stitch technique and that the Rebar Repair would have a lower rate of suture cutting through the meniscus.
机译:背景径向半月板撕裂会导致半月板完全不称职。这种严重的半月板撕裂可能很难修复。已经开发出将弯月面撕裂边缘并置并且能够承受高负荷的技术。这项研究的目的是确定radial骨半月板撕裂的加固缝合线修复(钢筋修复)的破坏载荷,并将其与平行缝合技术和十字绣技术进行比较,并比较所有三组之间的破坏方式。假设是,与平行技术和十字绣技术相比,钢筋修复将具有更高的破坏负荷,并且钢筋修复将具有较低的弯月面缝合率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号