首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>i-Perception >Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression
【2h】

Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression

机译:抑制的视觉隐现刺激与听觉隐现信号不整合:来自持续闪光抑制的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous studies using binocular rivalry have shown that signals in a modality other than the visual can bias dominance durations depending on their congruency with the rivaling stimuli. More recently, studies using continuous flash suppression (CFS) have reported that multisensory integration influences how long visual stimuli remain suppressed. In this study, using CFS, we examined whether the contrast thresholds for detecting visual looming stimuli are influenced by a congruent auditory stimulus. In Experiment 1, we show that a looming visual stimulus can result in lower detection thresholds compared to a static concentric grating, but that auditory tone pips congruent with the looming stimulus did not lower suppression thresholds any further. In Experiments 2, 3, and 4, we again observed no advantage for congruent multisensory stimuli. These results add to our understanding of the conditions under which multisensory integration is possible, and suggest that certain forms of multisensory integration are not evident when the visual stimulus is suppressed from awareness using CFS.
机译:先前使用双目竞争的研究表明,除了视觉之外的其他形式的信号,可能会根据其与竞争刺激的一致性来偏离主导时间。最近,使用连续闪光抑制(CFS)的研究报告说,多感觉整合影响视觉刺激保持抑制的时间。在这项研究中,我们使用CFS检查了用于检测视觉迫在眉睫的刺激的对比阈值是否受到一致的听觉刺激的影响。在实验1中,我们表明,与静态同心光栅相比,若隐若现的视觉刺激可导致较低的检测阈值,但与隐约的刺激一致的听觉点不会进一步降低抑制阈值。在实验2、3和4中,我们再次观察到一致的多感觉刺激没有优势。这些结果加深了我们对可能进行多感觉整合的条件的理解,并表明当使用CFS抑制视觉刺激来感知时,某些形式的多感觉整合并不明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号