首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Global Pediatric Health >Why Are We Cutting? A Survey of Cultural Views on Circumcision in the Texas Panhandle
【2h】

Why Are We Cutting? A Survey of Cultural Views on Circumcision in the Texas Panhandle

机译:我们为什么要切割?德州Panhandle包皮环切术的文化观调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To determine the factors that may contribute to parents’ decision to circumcise their son in the Texas Panhandle region, voluntary surveys were distributed to all mothers with term male newborns during the mandatory discharge planning class. The father being circumcised (P < .0001), Caucasian (P < .05), and some graduate school of the caregiver (P < .011) were factors most correlated with newborns being circumcised. Newborns of Hispanic origin, those having Medicaid insurance, and a Catholic affiliation were less likely to be circumcised. No significant correlations were found between circumcision and other ethnic affiliations, caregiver’s age, father’s involvement, and medical counseling. Of note, one third of caregivers were not counseled by a medical professional about circumcision. While the American Academy of Pediatrics Circumcision Policy Statement is clear that a neutral position must be maintained, this does not preclude having a discussion of the benefits versus the risks of circumcision.
机译:为了确定可能导致父母决定在得克萨斯州潘汉德尔地区对儿子进行割礼的因素,在强制性出院计划课程期间,向所有有足月初生婴儿的母亲进行了自愿调查。父亲被割礼(P <.0001),高加索人(P <.05)和看护者的一些研究生院(P <.011)是与新生儿割礼有关的因素。来自西班牙裔的新生儿,有医疗补助保险的人和有天主教信仰的人受到割礼的可能性较小。包皮环切术与其他种族,环顾者的年龄,父亲的参与程度以及医疗咨询之间没有发现显着相关性。值得注意的是,三分之一的看护者并未接受医学专家对包皮环切术的咨询。尽管《美国儿科包皮环切术政策声明》明确指出必须保持中立立场,但这并不排除讨论包皮环切术的益处与风险之间的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号