首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Genomics Society and Policy >Product not process! Explaining a basic concept in agricultural biotechnologies and food safety
【2h】

Product not process! Explaining a basic concept in agricultural biotechnologies and food safety

机译:产品不是过程!解释农业生物技术和食品安全的基本概念

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Most life scientists have relentlessly recommended any evaluative approach of agri-food products to be based on examination of the phenotype, i.e. the actual characteristics of the food, feed and fiber varieties: the effects of any new cultivar (or micro-organism, animal) on our health are not dependent on the process(es), the techniques used to obtain it.The so-called “genetically modified organisms” (“GMOs”), on the other hand, are commonly framed as a group with special properties – most frequently seen as dubious, or even harmful.Some social scientists still believe that considering the process is a correct background for science-based understanding and regulation. To show that such an approach is utterly wrong, and to invite scientists, teachers and science communicators to explain this mistake to students, policy-makers and the public at large, we imagined a dialogue between a social scientist, who has a positive opinion about a certain weight that a process-based orientation should have in the risk assessment, and a few experts who offer plenty of arguments against that view. The discussion focuses on new food safety.
机译:大多数生命科学家一直不遗余力地建议任何农业食品产品的评估方法都应基于表型的检查,即食物,饲料和纤维品种的实际特征:任何新品种(或微生物,动物)的影响对我们的健康而言,它不依赖于获得过程的技术。另一方面,所谓的“基因改造生物”(GMOs)通常被归类为具有特殊性质的一组–一些社会科学家仍然认为,考虑这一过程是基于科学的理解和监管的正确背景。为了表明这种方法是完全错误的,并邀请科学家,教师和科学传播者向学生,政策制定者和广大公众解释这一错误,我们设想了一位社会科学家之间的对话,他对在风险评估中应该以基于流程的指导为基础,并提供一些反对该观点的专家。讨论的重点是新食品安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号