首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neuroscience >Evolutionary Musicology Meets Embodied Cognition: Biocultural Coevolution and the Enactive Origins of Human Musicality
【2h】

Evolutionary Musicology Meets Embodied Cognition: Biocultural Coevolution and the Enactive Origins of Human Musicality

机译:进化音乐学与情感认知相遇:生物文化共进化与人类音乐性的活跃起源

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite evolutionary musicology's interdisciplinary nature, and the diverse methods it employs, the field has nevertheless tended to divide into two main positions. Some argue that music should be understood as a naturally selected adaptation, while others claim that music is a product of culture with little or no relevance for the survival of the species. We review these arguments, suggesting that while interesting and well-reasoned positions have been offered on both sides of the debate, the nature-or-culture (or adaptation vs. non-adaptation) assumptions that have traditionally driven the discussion have resulted in a problematic either/or dichotomy. We then consider an alternative “biocultural” proposal that appears to offer a way forward. As we discuss, this approach draws on a range of research in theoretical biology, archeology, neuroscience, embodied and ecological cognition, and dynamical systems theory (DST), positing a more integrated model that sees biological and cultural dimensions as aspects of the same evolving system. Following this, we outline the enactive approach to cognition, discussing the ways it aligns with the biocultural perspective. Put simply, the enactive approach posits a deep continuity between mind and life, where cognitive processes are explored in terms of how self-organizing living systems enact relationships with the environment that are relevant to their survival and well-being. It highlights the embodied and ecologically situated nature of living agents, as well as the active role they play in their own developmental processes. Importantly, the enactive approach sees cognitive and evolutionary processes as driven by a range of interacting factors, including the socio-cultural forms of activity that characterize the lives of more complex creatures such as ourselves. We offer some suggestions for how this approach might enhance and extend the biocultural model. To conclude we briefly consider the implications of this approach for practical areas such as music education.
机译:尽管进化音乐学具有跨学科的性质,并且采用了多种多样的方法,但该领域仍倾向于划分为两个主要位置。一些人认为音乐应该被理解为自然选择的适应,而另一些人则认为音乐是文化的产物,与该物种的生存几乎没有关系。我们回顾了这些论点,表明尽管辩论的双方都提出了有趣且合理的立场,但传统上推动讨论的自然或文化(或适应与不适应)假设导致了有问题的(或)二分法。然后,我们考虑另一种“生物文化”提议,该提议似乎提供了前进的道路。正如我们所讨论的,这种方法借鉴了理论生物学,考古学,神经科学,具体化和生态认知以及动力学系统理论(DST)的一系列研究,提出了一个更加集成的模型,该模型将生物学和文化维度视为同一方面的发展系统。在此之后,我们概述了认知的积极方法,并讨论了其与生物文化观点相一致的方式。简而言之,积极的方法在思想与生活之间建立了深厚的连续性,在此过程中,认知过程是根据自我组织的生命系统如何与环境建立与生存和福祉相关的关系的。它强调了生物体的体现和生态定位性质,以及它们在自身发展过程中所发挥的积极作用。重要的是,积极的方法认为认知和进化过程是由一系列相互作用因素驱动的,这些因素包括表征更复杂的生物(例如我们自己)生活的社会文化形式。我们为这种方法如何增强和扩展生物文化模型提供一些建议。总之,我们简要地考虑了这种方法对音乐教育等实际领域的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号