首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Sponsored Documents >Targeting reasoning biases in delusions: A pilot study of the Maudsley Review Training Programme for individuals with persistent high conviction delusions
【2h】

Targeting reasoning biases in delusions: A pilot study of the Maudsley Review Training Programme for individuals with persistent high conviction delusions

机译:针对妄想中的推理偏见:针对患有持续性高信念的妄想者的Maudsley Review培训计划的初步研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Delusions are often resistant to change, persisting despite successful antipsychotic treatment or Cognitive Behavioural Therapy. This study aimed to target reasoning processes, particularly the ‘Jumping to Conclusions’ (JTC) bias and belief flexibility, which are thought to play a part in maintaining delusional conviction.13 participants with a diagnosis of psychosis and high levels of conviction in their delusions completed a one-off computerised training package, lasting approximately 1.5 h. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, pre-intervention (two weeks later), post-intervention (immediately after completing the training) and at 1 month follow-up.The package was well received by participants. There were improvements in JTC, belief flexibility and delusional conviction between pre- and post-intervention measures. Controlled studies powered to detect changes in key outcomes are warranted in order to evaluate the efficacy of the programme.
机译:妄想通常对变化有抵抗力,尽管成功进行了抗精神病药物治疗或认知行为疗法,但仍然持续存在。这项研究旨在针对推理过程,特别是“跳至结论”(JTC)偏见和信念灵活性,这些因素被认为在保持妄想定罪中发挥了作用。13被诊断出患有精神病且信念高的人完成了一次性的计算机化培训套件,持续了大约1.5小时。在基线,干预前(两周后),干预后(完成培训后立即)和随访1个月时评估结果。干预前和干预后之间的JTC,信念灵活性和妄想信念得到了改善。为了评估该计划的有效性,有必要开展旨在检测关键结果变化的对照研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号