首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Sponsored Documents >Interacting institutional logics in general dental practice
【2h】

Interacting institutional logics in general dental practice

机译:在一般牙科实践中互动机构逻辑

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We investigate the organisational field of general dental practice and how agents change or maintain the institution of values associated with the everyday work of health care provision. Our dataset comprise archival literature and policy documents, interview data from field level actors, as well as service delivery level interview data and secondary data gathered (2011–12) from 16 English dental practices. Our analysis provides a typology of institutional logics (prevailing systems of value) experienced in the field of dental practice. Confirming current literature, we find two logics dominate how care is assessed: business-like health care and medical professionalism. We advance the literature by finding the business-like health care logic further distinguished by values of commercialism on the one hand and those of accountability and procedural diligence on the other. The logic of professionalism we also find is further distinguished into a commitment to clinical expertise and independence in delivering patient care on the one hand, and concerns for the autonomy and sustainability of a business enterprise on the other.
机译:我们调查一般牙科实践的组织领域,以及代理商如何改变或维持与医疗保健日常工作相关的价值观制度。我们的数据集包括档案文献和政策文件,来自现场活动人员的访谈数据,以及从16种英语牙科实践中收集的服务提供水平的访谈数据和辅助数据(2011-12年)。我们的分析提供了在牙科实践领域经验丰富的制度逻辑(普遍的价值体系)的类型学。确认现有文献后,我们发现两种逻辑支配着评估护理的方式:类似企业的护理和医疗专业人员。我们通过发现一方面以商业主义的价值观,另一方面以问责制和程序勤奋的价值观为特征的类似于企业的医疗保健逻辑,来推进文献研究。我们还发现,专业精神的逻辑进一步被区分为:一方面致力于提供临床专业知识和提供病人护理方面的独立性,另一方面又对商业企业的自主性和可持续性表示关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号