首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Sponsored Documents >Comparison of oil removal in surfactant alternating gas with water alternating gas water flooding and gas flooding in secondary oil recovery process
【2h】

Comparison of oil removal in surfactant alternating gas with water alternating gas water flooding and gas flooding in secondary oil recovery process

机译:二次采油过程中表面活性剂交替气与水交替气除油注水和注气的除油比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Growing oil prices coupled with large amounts of residual oil after operating common enhanced oil recovery methods has made using methods with higher operational cost economically feasible.Nitrogen is one of the gases used in both miscible and immiscible gas injection process in oil reservoir. In heterogeneous formations gas tends to breakthrough early in production wells due to overriding, fingering and channeling. Surfactant alternating gas (SAG) injection is one of the methods commonly used to decrease this problem. Foam which is formed on the contact of nitrogen and surfactant increases viscosity of injected gas. This increases the oil–gas contact and sweep efficiency, although adsorption of surfactant on rock surface can causes difficulties and increases costs of process. Many parameters must be considered in design of SAG process. One of the most important parameters is SAG ratio that should be in optimum value to improve the flooding efficiency.In this study, initially the concentration of surfactant was optimized due to minimization of adsorption on rock surface which results in lower cost of surfactant. So, different sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) concentrations of 100, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000 and 4000 ppm were used to obtain the optimum concentration at 70 °C and 144.74×105 Pa. A simple, clean and relatively fast spectrophotometric method was used for determination of surfactant which is based on the formation of an ion-pair. Then the effect of surfactant to gas volume ratio on oil recovery in secondary oil recovery process during execution of immiscible surfactant alternating gas injection was examined experimentally. The experiments were performed with sand pack under certain temperature, pressure and constant rate. Experiments were performed with surfactant to gas ratio of 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 2:1 and 3:1 and 1.2 pore volume injected. Then, comparisons were made between obtained results (SAG) with water flooding, gas flooding and water alternating gas (WAG) processes.This study shows that using the concentration of 1500 ppm of surfactant solution is practical and economical. Results also show that the SAG ratio of 1:1 with 0.2 cm3/min at temperature and pressure of 70 °C and 144.74×105 Pa, has the maximum oil removal efficiency. In this SAG ratio, stable foam was formed and viscous fingering delayed in comparison to other ratios. Finally, the results demonstrated that SAG injection has higher oil recovery in comparison to other displacement methods (water flooding, gas flooding and WAG).
机译:在使用普通的强化采油方法后,不断上涨的石油价格加上大量的残油已使使用具有较高运行成本的方法在经济上变得可行。氮气是储油层中混溶和不混溶气体注入过程中使用的气体之一。在非均质地层中,由于覆盖,指压和窜流,天然气往往会在生产井的早期突破。表面活性剂交替气体(SAG)注入是通常用于减少此问题的方法之一。在氮气和表面活性剂接触时形成的泡沫会增加注入气体的粘度。尽管表面活性剂在岩石表面的吸附会造成困难并增加加工成本,但这可以提高油气接触和吹扫效率。在SAG工艺的设计中必须考虑许多参数。最重要的参数之一是SAG比,该参数应为最佳值以提高驱油效率。在这项研究中,最初是由于最小化岩石表面的吸附而优化了表面活性剂的浓度,从而降低了表面活性剂的成本。因此,使用浓度分别为100、500、1000、2000、3000和4000ppm的十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)来在70°C和144.74×10 5 Pa下获得最佳浓度。 ,使用清洁且相对较快的分光光度法测定基于离子对形成的表面活性剂。然后,通过实验研究了在不混溶的表面活性剂交替注气过程中,表面活性剂/气体体积比对二次采油过程中油采收率的影响。实验是在一定温度,压力和恒定速率下用沙包进行的。用注入的孔体积为1:1、1:2、1:3、2:1和3:1的表面活性剂与气体的比例进行实验。然后,对注水,注气和水交替气(WAG)工艺所得结果(SAG)进行了比较。研究表明,使用浓度为1500 ppm的表面活性剂溶液既实用又经济。结果还表明,在70°C和144.74×10 5 Pa的温度和压力下,SAG比为1:1,0.2 cm 3 / min去除效率。在该SAG比率下,与其他比率相比,形成了稳定的泡沫并且粘性指状物被延迟。最后,结果表明,与其他驱替方法(注水,注气和WAG)相比,SAG注水具有更高的采油率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号