首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Medical Sciences >The Role of Serum Procalcitonin Levels in Predicting Ascitic Fluid Infection in Hospitalized Cirrhotic and Non-cirrhotic Patients
【2h】

The Role of Serum Procalcitonin Levels in Predicting Ascitic Fluid Infection in Hospitalized Cirrhotic and Non-cirrhotic Patients

机译:血清降钙素水平在预测肝硬化和非肝硬化患者腹水感染中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Objective: To determine the role of serum procalcitonin levels in predicting ascites infection in hospitalized cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.>Methods: A total of 101 patients (mean age: 63.4±1.3, 66.3% were males) hospitalized due to cirrhosis (n=88) or malignancy related (n=13) ascites were included in this study. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP, 19.8%), culture-negative SBP (38.6%), bacterascites (4.9%), sterile ascites (23.8%) and malign ascites (12.9%) groups were compared in terms of procalcitonin levels in predicting ascites infection. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of procalcitonin levels and predicting outcome of procalcitonin levels was compared with C-reactive protein (CRP).>Results: Culture positivity was determined in 26.7% of overall population. Serum procalcitonin levels were determined to be significantly higher in patients with positive bacterial culture in ascitic fluid compared to patients without culture positivity (median (min-max): 4.1 (0.2-36.4) vs. 0.4 (0.04-15.8), p<0.001). Using ROC analysis, a serum procalcitonin level of <0.61 ng/mL in SBP (area under curve (AUC): 0.981, CI 95%: 0.000-1.000, p<0.001), <0.225 ng/mL in culture-negative SBP (AUC: 0.743, CI 95%: 0.619-0.867, p<0.001), <0.42 ng/mL in SBP and culture-negative SBP patients (AUC: 0.824, CI 95%: 0.732-0.916, p<0.001), and <1.12 ng/mL in bacterascites (AUC: 0.837, CI 95%: 0.000-1.000, p=0.019) were determined to accurately rule out the diagnosis of bacterial peritonitis. Predictive power of serum procalcitonin levels in SBP + culture-negative SBP group (AUCs: 0.824 vs 0.622, p=0.004, Fig 4), culture-positive SBP (AUCs: 0.981 vs 0.777, p=0.006, Fig 5) and (although less powerfull) in culture-negative SBP (AUCs: 0.743 vs 0.543, p=0.02, Fig 6) were found significantly higher than CRP.>Conclusion: According to our findings determination of serum procalcitonin levels seems to provide satisfactory diagnostic accuracy in differentiating bacterial infections in hospitalized patients with liver cirrhosis related ascites.
机译:>目的:确定血清降钙素原水平在预测肝硬化和非肝硬化住院患者腹水感染中的作用。>方法:共有101例患者(平均年龄:63.4±在本研究中,因肝硬化住院(n = 88)或与恶性肿瘤有关的腹水(n = 13),有1.3%的男性为66.3%。比较自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP,19.8%),培养阴性SBP(38.6%),细菌性腹水(4.9%),无菌性腹水(23.8%)和恶性腹水(12.9%)组在降钙素原水平上预测腹水感染的情况。接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线用于评估降钙素水平的诊断性能,并将降钙素水平的预测结果与C反应蛋白(CRP)进行比较。>结果:确定的培养阳性率为26.7%总人口。与无培养阳性的患者相比,腹水细菌培养阳性的患者的血清降钙素水平显着更高(中位数(最小-最大值):4.1(0.2-36.4)vs. 0.4(0.04-15.8),p <0.001 )。使用ROC分析,在SBP中血清降钙素原水平<0.61 ng / mL(曲线下面积(AUC):0.981,CI 95%:0.000-1.000,p <0.001),在培养阴性SBP中<0.225 ng / mL( SBP和培养阴性SBP患者的AUC:0.743,CI 95%:0.619-0.867,p <0.001),<0.42 ng / mL(AUC:0.824,CI 95%:0.732-0.916,p <0.001),并且<测定菌液中的1.12 ng / mL(AUC:0.837,CI 95%:0.000-1.000,p = 0.019),以准确排除细菌性腹膜炎的诊断。尽管SBP +培养阴性SBP组(AUCs:0.824 vs 0.622,p = 0.004,图4),培养阳性SBP(AUCs:0.981 vs 0.777,p = 0.006,图5)和(尽管),血清降钙素水平的预测能力发现培养阴性的SBP(AUCs:0.743 vs 0.543,p = 0.02,图6)显着高于CRP。>结论:根据我们的发现,血清降钙素原水平的测定似乎提供了在鉴别肝硬化相关腹水住院患者的细菌感染方面具有令人满意的诊断准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号