首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine >Comparing clomiphen citrate plus HMG with clomiphen citrate plus rFSH in IUI cycles in couples with unexplained or male factor infertility: A prospective randomized study
【2h】

Comparing clomiphen citrate plus HMG with clomiphen citrate plus rFSH in IUI cycles in couples with unexplained or male factor infertility: A prospective randomized study

机译:在原因不明或男性因素不育的夫妇的IUI周期中比较柠檬酸克罗米芬加HMG与柠檬酸克罗米芬加FSH:一项前瞻性随机研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Different protocols are used for controlled ovarian hyper stimulation (COH), but the optimal method has not yet been determined. >Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) using clomiphen citrate (CC) plus HMG versus CC plus rFSH in intra uterine insemination cycles (IUI). >Materials and Methods: 144 women with unexplained or male factor infertility undergoing IUI cycles were randomized (72 patients in CC plus rFSH group and 72 patients in CC plus HMG group) and included in this single blind study from October 2006 to June 2010. The primary outcomes were clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates. The number of dominant follicles, mean of follicular size, endometrial thickness on the day of HCG administration, total dose of gonadotropins and duration of stimulation with gonadotropins were secondary outcomes. >Results: Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were not significantly different in the two groups .There was a significant higher multiple pregnancy rate in CC plus rFSH group (33.3%) versus CC plus HMG group (12.5%; p<0.005). There were no statistically significant differences in the secondary outcomes between the two groups. >Conclusion: According to our results it seems that CC plus HMG is a more suitable and cost-effective regimen than CC plus rFSH in IUI cycles in patients with unexplained or male factor infertility.
机译:>背景:不同的协议可用于控制性卵巢过度刺激(COH),但尚未确定最佳方法。 >目的:本研究的目的是比较宫内授精周期(IUI)中使用克罗米芬(CC)加HMG与CC加rFSH进行的受控卵巢刺激(COS)的结果。 >材料和方法:随机将144例接受IUI循环的原因不明或男性不育的女性(CC + rFSH组为72例患者,CC + HMG组为72例),从10月开始纳入该单盲研究2006年至2010年6月。主要结局为临床和持续妊娠率。次要结果是主要的卵泡数量,卵泡大小平均值,HCG注射当天的子宫内膜厚度,促性腺激素的总剂量和促性腺激素刺激的持续时间。 >结果:两组的临床和持续妊娠率无显着差异。CC + rFSH组(33.3%)明显高于CC + HMG组(12.5%; p <0.005)。两组之间的次要结局在统计学上没有显着差异。 >结论:根据我们的结果,对于原因不明或男性因素不育的患者,在IUI周期中CC + HMG似乎比CC + rFSH更合适且更具成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号