首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences >A Comparison of the effectiveness of Mammographic Film-Screen and Standard Film-Screen in the Detection of Small Bone Fractures
【2h】

A Comparison of the effectiveness of Mammographic Film-Screen and Standard Film-Screen in the Detection of Small Bone Fractures

机译:乳腺钼靶胶片筛和标准胶片筛在检测小骨骨折中的效果比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The use of mammography film-screen is limited in general radiography. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of mammographic film-screen and standard film-screen systems in the detection of small bone fractures. Radiographs were taken from patients' extremities and neck areas using mammography film-screen and standard film-screen (n=57 each). Fourteen other radiographs were taken from other views (predominantly oblique views), making a total number of 128 radiographs. Paired radiographs, taken from the same areas, were compared by two radiologists in terms of image visual sharpness, presence of bony fractures, and soft tissue injuries. The surface dose received by patients in the two systems was also compared. The radiographs taken by mammography film-screen had a statistically better visual sharpness compared to those taken by the standard film-screen system. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the diagnostic accuracy of the two systems. Mammography film-screen was able to detect only one out of 57 lesions, whereas standard film-screen system did not detec any lesion. The surface dose received by patients in mammography film-screen was higher than that in standard film-screen system. The findings of the present study suggest that mammography film-screen may be recommended as a diagnostic tool for the detection of small fractures of tinny parts of body such as fingers, hand or foot. They also suggest that mammography film-screen has no advantage over standard film-screen for radiography of thick body parts such as neck and knee.
机译:乳腺X射线摄影胶片的使用受到一般射线照相的限制。这项研究的目的是比较乳腺X线胶片屏幕和标准胶片屏幕系统在检测小骨骨折中的有效性。使用乳腺X光摄影胶片和标准胶片(每组n = 57)从患者的四肢和颈部拍摄射线照片。从其他视图(主要是斜视图)拍摄了其他14幅射线照片,总共有128幅射线照片。两位放射科医生对来自同一地区的成对的X光片进行了比较,包括图像的视觉清晰度,骨骨折的存在和软组织损伤。还比较了两种系统中患者接受的表面剂量。与标准胶片屏幕系统所拍摄的影像相比,乳房X线胶片系统所拍摄的X光片在统计学上具有更好的视觉清晰度。但是,两个系统的诊断准确性之间没有统计学上的显着差异。乳腺X光片检查仅能检测出57个病变中的一个,而标准的胶片筛查系统无法检测到任何病变。乳房X光摄影胶片屏幕上患者接受的表面剂量高于标准胶片屏幕系统中的表面剂量。本研究的发现表明,可以建议使用乳房X线胶片屏幕作为诊断工具,以检测身体细小部位的细小骨折,例如手指,手或脚。他们还建议,对于厚身体部位(如脖子和膝盖)的放射线照相,乳房X线照相胶片屏幕没有标准胶片屏幕的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号