首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>ISRN Radiology >Assessment of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values as Predictor of Aggressiveness in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer: Comparison with Gleason Score
【2h】

Assessment of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values as Predictor of Aggressiveness in Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer: Comparison with Gleason Score

机译:评估表观扩散系数值作为周围区前列腺癌侵略性的预测指标:与格里森评分的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose. To determine association between apparent diffusion coefficient value on diffusion-weighted imaging and Gleason score in patients with prostate cancer. Methods. This retrospective case series was conducted at Radiology Department of Aga Khan University between June 2009 and June 2011. 28 patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer were included who underwent ultrasound guided sextant prostate biopsy and MRI. MRI images were analyzed on diagnostic console and regions of interest were drawn. Data were entered and analyzed on SPSS 20.0. ADC values were compared with Gleason score using one-way ANOVA test. Results. In 28 patients, 168 quadrants were biopsied and 106 quadrants were positive for malignancy. 89 lesions with proven malignancy showed diffusion restriction. The mean ADC value for disease with a Gleason score of 6 was 935 mm2/s (SD = 248.4 mm2/s); Gleason score of 7 was 837 mm2/s (SD = 208.5 mm2/s); Gleason score of 8 was 614 mm2/s (SD = 108 mm2/s); and Gleason score of 9 was 571 mm2/s (SD = 82 mm2/s). Inverse relationship was observed between Gleason score and mean ADC values. Conclusion. DWI and specifically quantitative ADC values may help differentiate between low-risk (Gleason score, 6), intermediate-risk (Gleason score, 7), and high-risk (Gleason score 8 and 9) prostate cancers, indirectly determining the aggressiveness of the disease.
机译:目的。为了确定扩散加权成像的表观扩散系数值与前列腺癌患者的Gleason评分之间的关​​联。方法。该回顾性病例系列研究于2009年6月至2011年6月在阿迦汗大学放射科进行。纳入了28例经活检证实为前列腺癌的患者,他们接受了超声引导的六分法前列腺活检和MRI检查。在诊断控制台上分析MRI图像并绘制感兴趣区域。输入数据并在SPSS 20.0上进行分析。使用单向方差分析将ADC值与Gleason得分进行比较。结果。在28例患者中,对168个象限进行了活检,对106个象限的恶性肿瘤呈阳性。 89例经证实为恶性的病变显示出扩散受限。格里森评分为6的疾病的平均ADC值为935 mm 2 / s(SD = 248.4 mm 2 / s);格里森得分7为837 mm 2 / s(SD = 208.5 mm 2 / s);格里森得分8为614 mm 2 / s(SD = 108 mm 2 / s); Gleason得分9为571 mm 2 / s(SD = 82 mm 2 / s)。格里森得分与平均ADC值之间存在反比关系。结论。 DWI以及具体的定量ADC值可帮助区分低危(Gleason评分,6),中危(Gleason评分,7)和高危(Gleason评分8和9)前列腺癌,间接确定了前列腺癌的侵袭性。疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号