首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>JARO: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology >Do Forward- and Backward-Traveling Waves Occur Within theCochlea? Countering the Critique of Nobili et al.
【2h】

Do Forward- and Backward-Traveling Waves Occur Within theCochlea? Countering the Critique of Nobili et al.

机译:向前和向后传播的波是否发生在耳蜗?对抗Nobili等人的批评。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The question of whether or not forward- and backward-traveling waves occur within the cochlea constitutes a long-standing controversy in cochlear mechanics recently brought to the fore by the problem of understanding otoacoustic emissions. Nobili and colleagues articulate the opposition to the traveling-wave viewpoint by arguing that wave-equation formulations of cochlear mechanics fundamentally misrepresent the hydrodynamics of the cochlea [e.g., Nobili et al. (2003) J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 4:478–494]. To correct the perceived deficiencies of the wave-equation formulation, Nobili et al. advocate an apparently altogether different approach to cochlear modeling—the so-called “hydrodynamic” or “Green’s function” approach—in which cochlear responses are represented not as forward- and backward-traveling waves but as weighted sums of the motions of individual basilar membrane oscillators, each interacting with the others via forces communicated instantaneously through the cochlear fluids. In this article, we examine Nobili and colleagues’ arguments and conclusions while attempting to clarify the broader issues at stake. We demonstrate that the one-dimensional wave-equation formulation of cochlear hydrodynamics does not misrepresent long-range fluid coupling in the cochlea, as claimed. Indeed, we show that the long-range component of Nobili etal.’s three-dimensional force propagator is identical to the hydrodynamic Green’sfunction representing a one-dimensional tapered transmission line. Furthermore,simulations that Nobili et al. use to discredit wave-equation formulations ofcochlear mechanics (i.e., cochlear responses to excitation at a point along thebasilar membrane) are readily reproduced and interpreted using a simplesuperposition of forward- and backward-traveling waves. Nobili and coworkers’critique of wave-equation formulations of cochlear mechanics thus appears to bewithout compelling foundation. Although the traveling-wave and hydrodynamicformulations impose strikingly disparate conceptual and computational frameworks,the two approaches ultimately describe the same underlying physics.
机译:在耳蜗内是否发生向前和向后移动的问题,是最近由于对耳声发射的理解而引起关注的耳蜗力学中长期存在的争议。 Nobili和他的同事指出,耳蜗力学的波动方程式从根本上误解了耳蜗的流体动力学,从而阐明了对行波观点的反对意见(例如,Nobili等人。 (2003)J. Assoc。 Res。耳鼻咽喉科。 4:478–494]。为了纠正波方程公式的感知缺陷,Nobili等人。提倡一种完全不同的耳蜗建模方法,即所谓的“水动力”或“格林函数”方法,其中耳蜗反应不是以前进和后退行波的形式表示,而是以各个基底膜运动的加权和表示的。振子,每个振子通过通过耳蜗液即时传递的力互相作用。在本文中,我们将尝试研究Nobili及其同事的论点和结论,同时试图弄清更重要的问题。我们证明,耳蜗水动力的一维波方程公式化不会误导耳蜗中的远程流体耦合,如所主张的。实际上,我们证明了Nobili等人的远程组成部分等人的三维力传播器与水动力格林的函数代表一维锥形传输线。此外,Nobili等人的模拟。用于抹煞波的方程耳蜗力学(即耳蜗对沿某一点的激发的响应)。基底膜)很容易使用简单的方法进行复制和解释前后行波的叠加。 Nobili和同事的因此,对耳蜗力学的波方程公式的批评似乎是没有令人信服的基础。虽然行波和水动力公式强加了截然不同的概念和计算框架,两种方法最终描述了相同的基础物理学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号