首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Athletic Training >Ankle Bracing Plantar-Flexion Angle and Ankle Muscle Latencies During Inversion Stress in Healthy Participants
【2h】

Ankle Bracing Plantar-Flexion Angle and Ankle Muscle Latencies During Inversion Stress in Healthy Participants

机译:健康参与者的内翻应力过程中的踝关节支撑足底屈曲角度和踝肌潜伏期

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Context: Ankle braces may enhance ankle joint proprioception, which in turn may affect reflexive ankle muscle activity during a perturbation. Despite the common occurrence of plantar-flexion inversion ankle injuries, authors of previous studies of ankle muscle latencies have focused on inversion stresses only.>Objective: To examine the latency of the peroneus longus (PL), peroneus brevis (PB), and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles in response to various degrees of combined plantar-flexion and inversion stresses in braced and unbraced asymptomatic ankles.>Design: Repeated measures.>Setting: University biomechanics laboratory.>Patients or Other Participants: Twenty-eight healthy females and 12 healthy males (n = 40: mean age = 23.63 years, range = 19 to 30 years; height = 172.75 ± 7.96 cm; mass = 65.53 ± 12.0 kg).>Intervention(s): Participants were tested under 2 conditions: wearing and not wearing an Active Ankle T1 brace while dropping from a custom-made platform into 10°, 20°, and 30° of plantar flexion and 30° of inversion.>Main Outcome Measure(s): The time between platform drop and the onset of PL, PB, and TA electromyographic activity was measured to determine latencies. We calculated a series of 2-way analyses of variance to determine if latencies were different between the conditions (braced and unbraced) and among the plantar-flexion angles (α = .05).>Results: No interaction was found between condition and plantar-flexion angle. No significant main effects were found for condition or plantar-flexion angle. Overall means for braced and unbraced conditions were not significantly different for each muscle tested. Overall means for angle for the PL, PB, and TA were not significantly different.>Conclusions: Reflexive activity of the PL, PB, or TA was unaffected by the amount of plantar flexion or by wearing an Active Ankle T1 brace during an unanticipated plantar-flexion inversion perturbation.
机译:>上下文:踝关节支架可能会增强踝关节的本体感受,进而可能在扰动期间影响反射性踝肌的活动。尽管脚踝屈伸内翻常见于踝关节损伤,但以前的踝部肌肉潜伏期研究的作者仅着重于内翻应力。>目的:研究短腓骨长骨(PL)的潜伏期(PB)和胫骨前(TA)肌肉对无症状支撑和无支撑踝关节不同程度的足底屈曲和内翻应力的反应。>设计:重复测量。>设置:大学生物力学实验室。>患者或其他参与者:28位健康女性和12位健康男性(n = 40:平均年龄= 23.63岁,范围= 19至30岁;身高= 172.75±7.96厘米;质量= 65.53±12.0千克)。>干预:在2种情况下测试了参与者:从定制平台跌落到10°时,佩戴和不佩戴Active Ankle T1支架,足底屈曲20°和30°,内翻30°。>主要结果指标确定:测量平台下降到PL,PB和TA肌电活动开始之间的时间,以确定潜伏期。我们计算了一系列的2次方差分析,以确定条件(支撑和不支撑)之间以及足​​底屈曲角度之间的延迟是否不同(α= .05)。>结果:在条件和足底屈曲角度之间被发现。对于病情或足底屈曲角度,未发现明显的主要影响。对于每种测试的肌肉,支撑和未支撑条件的总体平均值没有显着差异。 >结论:PL,PB或TA的自反活动不受足底屈曲量或活动踝关节的影响在意想不到的足底屈曲反转扰动期间支撑T1。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号