首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Cancer >Prognostic Value of the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 Scale in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Large-Scale Cohort Study
【2h】

Prognostic Value of the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 Scale in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Large-Scale Cohort Study

机译:营养风险筛查2002年量表在转移性胃癌中的预后价值:一项大规模队列研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: The prognostic value of the nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002) scale in metastatic gastric cancer remains unclear. We aimed to explore the role of NRS 2002 in metastatic gastric cancer.>Methods: In this study, 1664 metastatic gastric cancer patients at our institution between 2000 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The characteristics and clinical outcomes of the included patients were analyzed.>Results: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that the regrouping NRS 2002 scale (≤ 3 vs. > 3) provided a similar risk stratification predicting 2-year overall survival (OS) (area under the curves [AUCs]: 0.563 vs. 0.564, P > 0.05) but a better stratification predicting the risk of complications of palliative surgery (AUCs: 0.563 vs. 0.522, P = 0.050) than the original NRS 2002 scale (< 3 vs. ≥ 3). Patients with NRS 2002 > 3 tended to have higher postoperative morbidity (13.3% vs. 8.5%, P = 0.027) and mortality (5.3% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.013) and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS: 6.70 vs. 7.70 months, P = 0.002) and overall survival (OS) (median OS: 9.03 vs. 12.63 months, P < 0.001) than those with NRS 2002 ≤ 3. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the regrouping NRS 2002 scale was the independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.16, P = 0.028) and OS (HR: 1.29, P < 0.001).>Conclusions: The present study indicated that the NRS 2002 scale (regrouping scale) was an independent prognostic factor to predict the morbidity, mortality and survival outcomes for metastatic gastric cancer.
机译:>背景:目前尚不清楚营养风险筛查2002(NRS 2002)量表在转移性胃癌中的预后价值。我们旨在探讨NRS 2002在转移性胃癌中的作用。>方法:在本研究中,我们回顾性分析了2000年至2015年间本院的1664例转移性胃癌患者。 >结果:接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线显示,重新分组的NRS 2002量表(≤3比> 3)提供了相似的危险分层预测2年总生存(OS)(曲线下面积[AUC]:0.563 vs. 0.564,P> 0.05),但更好的分层预测了姑息性手术并发症的风险(AUC:0.563 vs. 0.522,P = 0.050)原始的NRS 2002量表(<3 vs.≥3)。 NRS 2002> 3的患者倾向于更高的术后发病率(13.3%对8.5%,P = 0.027)和死亡率(5.3%对2.0%,P = 0.013)和较短的无进展生存期(PFS)(中位PFS) :比NRS 2002≤3的患者高6.70比7.70个月,P = 0.002)和总生存期(中位OS:9.03比12.63个月,P <0.001)。多变量分析表明,重新分组的NRS 2002量表是PFS(危险比[HR]:1.16,P = 0.028)和OS(HR:1.29,P <0.001)的独立预后因素。>结论:本研究表明,NRS 2002量表(重新分组)量表)是预测转移性胃癌的发病率,死亡率和生存结果的独立预后因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号