首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Global Health >Model for developing context-sensitive responses to vulnerability in research: managing ethical dilemmas faced by frontline research staff in Kenya
【2h】

Model for developing context-sensitive responses to vulnerability in research: managing ethical dilemmas faced by frontline research staff in Kenya

机译:开发研究中脆弱性的背景敏感响应的模型:管理肯尼亚前线研究人员面临的道德困境

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Health research in low-resource settings often involves individuals and populations defined as ‘vulnerable’. There is growing attention in the literature to the ethical dilemmas that frontline research staff face while conducting such research. However, there is little documented as to how research staff might support one another in identifying and handling these dilemmas in different contexts. Over the course of conducting empirical ethics research embedded in the Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition Network, we developed an approach to examine and respond to the ethical issues and dilemmas faced by the study teams, particularly frontline staff. In this paper we describe the specific tools and approach we developed, which centred on regular cross-team ethics reflection sessions, and share lessons learnt. We suggest that all studies involving potentially vulnerable participants should incorporate activities and processes to support frontline staff in identifying, reflecting on and responding to ethical dilemmas, throughout studies. We outline the resources needed to do this and share piloted tools for further adaptation and evaluation. Such initiatives should complement and feed into—and certainly not in any way replace or substitute for—strong institutional ethics review, safeguarding and health and safety policies and processes, as well broader staff training and career support initiatives.
机译:低资源环境中的健康研究往往涉及个人和人群被定义为“弱势群”。在进行这种研究时,对前线研究人员面临的道德困境中的文学中越来越关注。但是,对于研究人员在不同背景下的识别和处理这些困境中,研究人员如何互相支持。在嵌入儿童急性疾病和营养网络中嵌入的经验伦理研究过程中,我们开发了一种审查和回应研究团队,特别是前线员工面临的道德问题和困境的方法。在本文中,我们描述了我们开发的特定工具和方法,该方法以常规的跨团队伦理反思会话为中心,并分享经验教训。我们建议涉及潜在弱势群体参与者的所有研究都应纳入各种研究,以支持前线员工在整个研究中识别,反思和回应道德困境。我们概述了执行此操作所需的资源,并分享导向工具以进一步适应和评估。这些举措应补充和喂养,当然不是以任何方式取代或替代强大的制度伦理审查,维护和健康和安全政策以及流程,以及更广泛的员工培训和职业支持举措。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号