首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Advances in Nutrition >Understanding Pathways Between Agriculture Food Systems and Nutrition: An Evidence and Gap Map of Research Tools Metrics and Methods in the Last 10 Years
【2h】

Understanding Pathways Between Agriculture Food Systems and Nutrition: An Evidence and Gap Map of Research Tools Metrics and Methods in the Last 10 Years

机译:了解农业食品系统和营养之间的途径:过去10年的研究工具指标和方法的证据和缺口地图

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

New tools, metrics, and methods in agriculture, food systems, and nutrition (A&N) research proliferated in the decade following the 2007–2008 food price crisis. We map these developments across themes derived from conceptual A&N pathways and expert consultations. We created an interactive Evidence and Gap Map (EGM) from a systematic search of published and gray literature since 2008, following Campbell Collaboration guidelines. We retrieved over 30,000 reports from published literature databases, and individually searched 20 online repositories. We systematically screened 24,359 reports by title and/or abstract, 1577 by full report, and included 904 eligible reports. The EGM consists of rows of thematic domains and columns of types of tools, metrics, and methods, as well as extensive coding applied as filters. Each cell of the map represents research surrounding a type of tool, metric, or method within a given theme. Reports in each cell are grouped by stage of development, which expand to a corresponding bibliography. Users can filter EGM reports by various characteristics. The 4 most populated domains were: diets, nutrition, and health; primary food production; water, sanitation, and hygiene; and environment and sustainability. The 4 most common types of metrics, methods, and tools were: diet metrics; footprint analysis (especially water); technology applications; and network or Bayesian analysis. Gaps represent areas of few or no reports of innovation between 2008 and 2018. There were gaps in reports and innovations related to: power or conflicts of interest; food environments; markets; private sector engagement; food loss and waste; conflict; study design and system-level tools, metrics, and methods. The EGM is a comprehensive tool to navigate advances in measurement in A&N research: to highlight trends and gaps, conduct further synthesis and development, and prioritize the agenda for future work. This narrative synthesis accompanies the EGM, which can be found at https://www.anh-academy.org/evidence-and-gap-map.
机译:在2007 - 2008年粮食价格危机之后,农业,食品系统和营养(A&N)研究中的新工具,指标和方法(A&N)研究增殖。我们将这些事态划及跨越概念A&N途径和专家咨询的主题。在坎贝尔协作指南之后,我们从2008年开始的发布和灰色文献系统搜索了一个互动证据和差距地图(eGM)。我们从发布的文献数据库中检索了超过30,000个报告,并单独搜索了20个在线存储库。我们通过全额报告系统地通过标题和/或抽象,1577年播放了24,359个报告,并包含904个符合条件的报告。 eGM由类型的专题域和类型的类型,度量,度量和方法以及应用于滤波器的广泛编码组成。地图的每个单元代表了给定主题内围绕一种工具,指标或方法的研究。每个细胞的报告按开发阶段分组,扩展到相应的参考书目。用户可以通过各种特征过滤EGM报告。 4个最多的4个域名是:饮食,营养和健康;原发性食品生产;水,卫生和卫生;和环境和可持续性。 4个最常见的指标,方法和工具是:饮食度量;足迹分析(特别是水);技术应用;和网络或贝叶斯分析。差距代表2008年至2018年期间少数或没有创新的报告。报告和创新有关的差距:权力或利息冲突;食物环境;市场;私营部门参与;食物损失和浪费;冲突;研究设计和系统级工具,指标和方法。 eGM是一个综合工具,用于在A&N研究中导航测量的进步:以突出趋势和差距,进行进一步的综合和发展,并优先考虑议程以供未来的工作。这种叙事综合伴随着EGM,它可以在https://www.anh-academy.org/evidence-and-gap-map中找到。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号