首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Animal Science >PSXI-31 How is the ingestive behaviour of mid lactating Holstein cows grazing a fescue based pasture under two different defoliation intensities?
【2h】

PSXI-31 How is the ingestive behaviour of mid lactating Holstein cows grazing a fescue based pasture under two different defoliation intensities?

机译:PSXI-31中期哺乳期荷斯坦牛的摄取行为如何在两种不同的侧锯强度下放牧一种菲舍斯的牧场?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An experiment was performed to study the effect of two contrasting defoliation intensities of a fescue based pasture on the ingestive behaviour. Treatments were two grazing intensities: lax treatment (TL) 12 cm and control treatment (TC) 6 cm, with four replicants of 0.3 ha each. The starting of the experiment was determined by the three leaf stage. Twenty-four mid lactating Holstein cows were blocked according to parity, body weight, body condition score and calving date. Each plot was grazed by three cows during as many days as necessary until the defoliation height of each treatment was achieved (TL: 6 d; TC: 8 d). The pasture mass was 2530 ± 180 kgDM/ha and animals had access from 8:00 to 16:00. Each cow received 7.4 kgDM of supplementation (17% Crude Protein; 2.81 Mcal/kgDM). After PM milking (17:00 h) animals remained separated in 8 pens, where they received 5.5 kgDM in individual troughs. The remaining supplement was provided in the AM milking (05:00 h). During the access to the pasture, grazing and ruminating times and bites rate (BT; bites/minute) were determined every 5 minutes by visual observation at the beginning, middle and end of the experiment. Daily ruminating (DR) was also logged by electronic recorders in 2h periods (Heatime®HR, SCR Dairy). The PROC GLIMMIX of SAS (SAS 9.2, 2010) with a binomial response distribution and with Logit as a link function, was used to determine the probability of the different events. DR and BR were analysed with a mixed model with block and treatment as fixed effects. The probability of cows grazing was greater for TC than TL and lower for ruminating and DR (Table 1). There was no effect of treatment on BR (55 ± 8.8 bites/min). The changes observed on ingestive behaviour were reflected on productive performance (companion abstract).
机译:进行实验,以研究两个对比侧面侧膜牧场对牧场对摄取行为的影响。治疗是两种放牧强度:LAX处理(T1)12厘米和对照处理(Tc)6cm,每个重复剂为0.3公顷。实验的开始由三个叶阶段确定。根据奇偶校验,体重,身体状况得分和产犊日期阻止二十四个中期哺乳酸奶牛。在必要时,每次在三朵奶牛中覆盖每一个曲线,直到达到每种处理的落叶高度(T1:6 d; tc:8 d)。牧场是2530±180 kgdm / ha,动物从8:00到16:00获得。每台牛收到7.4kgdm的补充(17%粗蛋白; 2.81 mcal / kgdm)。 PM挤奶后(17:00)动物在8张钢笔中仍然分开,在那里他们在各个槽中获得5.5 kgdm。剩余的补充在挤奶中提供(05:00)。在进入牧场期间,通过在实验的开始,中间和结尾处通过视觉观察,每5分钟测定每隔5分钟的放牧和反转时间和咬合速率(BT;叮咬/分钟)。每日反刍(DR)也在2H期间电子记录器记录(SITMIME®HR,SCR乳制品)。 SAS(SAS 9.2,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20,20)用于确定不同事件的概率。用混合模型进行分析DR和BR,用块和治疗为固定效果。 TC的奶牛放牧的概率比TL更大,反馈和DR降低(表1)。没有对BR(55±8.8咬/分钟)的影响。对摄取行为观察的变化反映在生产性能(伴侣摘要)上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号