首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Animal Science >The effect of feed form and delivery method on feed microbiology and growth performance in grow-finisher pigs
【2h】

The effect of feed form and delivery method on feed microbiology and growth performance in grow-finisher pigs

机译:饲料形式及递送方法对生长植物饲料微生物学及生长性能的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is no generally accepted optimal feed form and delivery method for feeding finisher pigs. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of feed form (meal and pellet) and delivery method (liquid, dry, and wet/dry) on feed microbiology and growth, gain-to-feed ratio (G:F), and carcass quality of finisher pigs. Two batches of pigs were used, each with six pen replicates per treatment. In each batch 216 pigs (32.7 kg; ± 0.48 SE) housed in same-sex (entire male or female) pens of six pigs per pen were on treatment for ~62 d prior to slaughter. The experiment was a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement with two factors for diet form (meal and pellets) and three factors for feed delivery (dry, wet/dry, liquid). The treatments were 1) meal from dry feeder, 2) meal from wet/dry feeder, 3) meal from liquid system, 4) pellet from dry feeder, 5) pellet from wet/dry feeder, and 6) pellet from liquid system. Pig growth performance was determined, blood samples collected at slaughter for hematological analysis and microbiological and proximate analysis of feed performed. A significant feed form × delivery interaction was found for G:F. During the overall period G:F was 0.446, 0.433, 0.423, 0.474, 0.459, and 0.418 g/g (SE = 0.0080; P < 0.01) for treatments 1 through 6, respectively. When feed was pelleted, G:F was improved when feed delivery was dry or wet/dry compared to meal but when the delivery was liquid, pelleting did not affect G:F. There were no interactive effects for overall average daily gain (ADG). Overall ADG was 1,114 and 1,156 g/d (SE = 16.9; P < 0.01) for pigs fed diets in meal and pellet form, respectively and 1,080, 1,114, and 1,210 g/d (SE = 18.4; P < 0.001) for dry-, wet/dry-, and liquid-fed pigs, respectively. Carcass weight was 76.6 and 79.0 kg (SE = 0.55; P < 0.001) for pigs fed in meal and pellet form, respectively, while it was 74.7, 77.3, and 81.5 kg (SE = 0.60; P < 0.001) for pigs delivered dry, wet/dry, and liquid diets, respectively. Lactic acid bacteria (P < 0.05) and yeast (P < 0.01) counts in troughs were greater for the liquid than the dry diet in both meal and pelleted form. There was also evidence of lysine degradation in the liquid diet but this did not impact pig growth. Feeding the diet in pelleted vs. meal form led to lower hemoglobin and greater white blood cell and neutrophil counts (P < 0.05). To conclude, wet/dry feeding of a pelleted diet is recommended to maximize growth rate while optimizing G:F in grow-finisher pigs.
机译:通常没有接受的最佳饲料形式和送料理猪的递送方法。本研究的目的是比较饲料形式(膳食和颗粒)和递送方法(液体,干燥和湿/干)对饲料微生物学和生长,增益对饲料比(G:F)的影响,以及胴体猪的胴体品质。使用两批猪,每次治疗六支笔重复。在每批216颗猪(32.7千克;±0.48 SE),每笔六只猪的六只猪的钢笔均在屠宰前进行〜62d。该实验是2×3因子安排,两种因素为饮食形式(膳食和颗粒)和用于进料递送的三个因素(干燥,湿润/干燥,液体)。该治疗从干饲养饲养者1)粕,2)从湿/干饲养饲养者的餐点,3)液体系统,4)从干料,5)颗粒从湿/干料液中颗粒,6)液体系统颗粒。测定猪生长性能,在屠宰时收集血液样品进行血液学分析和微生物学分析的进料。找到了显着的饲料形式×G:F的递送相互作用。在整个时期G:F分别为0.446,0.433,0.423,0.474,0.459和0.418g / g(Se = 0.0080; p <0.01),分别用于治疗1至6。当颗粒料时,当进料递送干燥或湿润/干燥/干燥时,G:F得到改善,但当递送是液体时,造粒不影响G:F。整体平均每日增益(ADG)没有互动效果。对于膳食和颗粒形式的猪,总体ADG为1,114和1,156g / d(SE = 16.9g / d(SE = 16.9; p <0.01),分别为1,080,1114和1,080,1114和1,210g / d(se = 18.4; p <0.001),用于干燥 - ,湿润/干燥和液体喂猪猪。用于膳食和颗粒形式的猪的猪重量分别为76.6和79.0 kg(se = 0.55; p <0.001),而猪饲喂膳食和颗粒形式的猪为猪提供干燥的猪(= 0.60; p <0.001)分别,湿润/干燥和液体饮食。乳酸菌(P <0.05)和酵母(P <0.01)的谷物计数比膳食和颗粒形式的干燥饮食更大。还有液体饮食中赖氨酸降解的证据,但这并未影响猪生长。在颗粒中喂食饮食与膳食形式导致降低血红蛋白和更大的白细胞和中性粒细胞计数(P <0.05)。为了得出决定,建议湿润/干燥饲喂颗粒饮食,以最大限度地提高生长速度,同时优化G:F在生长终止猪中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号