首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sensors (Basel Switzerland) >Evaluation of Erythema Severity in Dermatoscopic Images of Canine Skin: Erythema Index Assessment and Image Sampling Reliability
【2h】

Evaluation of Erythema Severity in Dermatoscopic Images of Canine Skin: Erythema Index Assessment and Image Sampling Reliability

机译:评估犬皮肤皮肤图像的红斑严重程度:红斑指数评估和图像采样可靠性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The regular monitoring of erythema, one of the most important skin lesions in atopic (allergic) dogs, is essential for successful anti-allergic therapy. The smartphone-based dermatoscopy enables a convenient way to acquire quality images of erythematous skin. However, the image sampling to evaluate erythema severity is still done manually, introducing result variability. In this study, we investigated the correlation between the most popular erythema indices (EIs) and dermatologists’ erythema perception, and we measured intra- and inter-rater variability of the currently-used manual image-sampling methods (ISMs). We showed that the EIBRG, based on all three RGB (red, green, and blue) channels, performed the best with an average Spearman coefficient of 0.75 and a typical absolute disagreement of less than 14% with the erythema assessed by clinicians. On the other hand, two image-sampling methods, based on either selecting specific pixels or small skin areas, performed similarly well. They achieved high intra- and inter-rater reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Krippendorff’s alpha well above 0.90. These results indicated that smartphone-based dermatoscopy could be a convenient and precise way to evaluate skin erythema severity. However, better outlined, or even automated ISMs, are likely to improve the intra- and inter-rater reliability in severe erythematous cases.
机译:定期监测红斑,Atopic(过敏性)犬最重要的皮肤病因子之一,对于成功的抗过敏治疗至关重要。基于智能手机的皮肤镜检查使得可以提供一种可靠的炎性皮肤质量图像的便捷方式。但是,仍然手动进行评估红斑严重性的图像采样,引入结果可变性。在这项研究中,我们调查了最受欢迎的红斑索引(EIS)和皮肤科医生的红斑感知之间的相关性,我们测量了目前使用的手动图像采样方法(ISMS)的帧内间变异性。我们表明,基于所有三个RGB(红色,绿色和蓝色)渠道的EIBRG,平均SPEARMAN系数为0.75,临床医生评估的红斑典型的绝对分歧率小于14%。另一方面,基于选择特定像素或小型皮肤区域的两个图像采样方法同样地执行。它们通过脑内相关系数(ICC)和Krippendorff的alpha高于0.90,实现了高的内部和帧间间可靠性。这些结果表明,基于智能手机的皮肤病是评估皮肤红斑严重程度的方便和精确的方法。然而,更好的概述或甚至自动化的ISM可能会改善严重的红斑病例中的帧内间可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号