首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Mens Health >The Use of Delphi Method and Analytical Hierarchy Process in theEstablishment of Assessment Tools in Premature Ejaculation: The Scoring Systemfor Premature Ejaculation Treatment Outcomes
【2h】

The Use of Delphi Method and Analytical Hierarchy Process in theEstablishment of Assessment Tools in Premature Ejaculation: The Scoring Systemfor Premature Ejaculation Treatment Outcomes

机译:Delphi方法的使用和分析层次过程在早产射精中建立评估工具:评分系统用于早泄治疗结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is a lack of objective tools to comprehensively evaluate prematureejaculation (PE) treatment results clinically. We aimed to describe thedevelopment of a novel scoring system for PE treatment results as an example ofusing the Delphi method and an analytical hierarchy process for complexdecision-making in the field of sexual medicine. A Delphi question survey wasadopted to collect expert opinions from 47 Chinese specialists inandrology/urology on the assessment of PE treatment outcomes based on fourprimary properties, that is, the improvement in intravaginal ejaculation latencytime, a couple’s mental status, the ability to control ejaculation, and sexualintercourse satisfaction. Different weights on those primary properties wereassigned to create a mathematical hierarchy matrix and then perform an analysis.The scores were assigned according to the calculated weights. The ratio amongthe combined weights of the four primary properties was 1:3:2:3. The totalnumerical score was 36. Scores above 27, between 26 and 18, and below 17indicated significant improvement, moderate improvement, and no improvement inPE, respectively, with selected treatments. The scoring system with 36 pointscan be used by physicians, patients, and their sexual partners tocomprehensively and objectively assess quantitative PE treatment results.
机译:缺乏客观的工具,可以全面评估早产射精(PE)治疗结果临床上。我们的目标是描述作为一个新的PE治疗结果的分量系统的开发作为一个例子使用Delphi方法和复杂的分析层次过程在性医学领域的决策。 Delphi问题调查是采用47中国专家收集专家意见基于四个的体育治疗成果评估的育种学/泌尿外科主要特性,即,阴道内射精延迟的改善时间,夫妇的精神状态,控制射精的能力,以及性的能力性交满意度。对这些主要属性的不同权重分配以创建数学层次结构矩阵,然后执行分析。根据计算的权重分数。比率之间的比率四个主要特性的组合重量为1:3:2:3。总数数值分数为36. 27岁以上的分数,在26到18之间,低于17表明显着改善,适度改善,没有改善PE分别具有选定的治疗方法。评分系统36分可以由医生,患者和他们的性伴侣使用全面,客观地评估定量PE治疗结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号