首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >The Comparison of Perfectionism and Commitment between Professional and Amateur Golfers and the Association between Perfectionism and Commitment in the Two Groups
【2h】

The Comparison of Perfectionism and Commitment between Professional and Amateur Golfers and the Association between Perfectionism and Commitment in the Two Groups

机译:专业与业余高尔夫球手与两组完美主义与承诺之间的完美主义与承诺的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study investigated differences in perfectionist traits and commitment between professional and amateur golfers, as well as correlations among perfectionist traits, commitment, and golf handicap. Using simple random sampling, 486 professional golfers (mean age = 22.1 ± 3.0, 52.1% female) and 233 amateur golfers (mean age = 44.8 ± 10.2, 55.8% female) were recruited and assessed using the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS) and Expansion of Sports Commitment Model (ESCM). An ANCOVA, controlling for age, golf career length, and training time, revealed lower MPS self-oriented scores (10.3%; = 8.9, < 0.01; effect size [ES] = 0.498) and higher ESCM-Cognition (12.6%; = 9.4, < 0.01; ES = 0.691) and ESCM-Behavior (9.4%; = 4.6, = 0.03; ES = 0.479) scores in professional golfers than in amateur golfers. In partial correlations controlling for age, golf career length, and training time, professional golfers’ MPS scores were negatively associated with ESCM-Cognition scores ( = -0.30, < 0.001). Professional golfers’ mean golf handicap was positively correlated with MPS total ( = 0.33, < 0.01). Altogether, golfers seeking to attain high levels of performance must consider the mental aspect of golfing and find ways to maximize commitment levels while minimizing perfectionist traits.
机译:本研究调查了专业和业余高尔夫球手之间完美主义性状和承诺的差异,以及完美主义者特征,承诺和高尔夫障碍之间的相关性。使用简单的随机抽样,486名专业高尔夫球手(平均年龄= 22.1±3.0,52.1%的女性)和233个生物遗产高尔夫球手(平均年龄= 44.8±10.2,55.8%的女性)使用多维完美主义(MPS)和扩张评估体育承诺模型(ESCM)。 ANCOVA,控制年龄,高尔夫职业长度和培训时间,显示出较低的MPS自定位评分(10.3%; = 8.9,<0.01;效果尺寸[ES] = 0.498)和更高的ESCM-认知(12.6%; = 9.4,<0.01; ES = 0.691)和ESCM行为(9.4%; = 4.6,= 0.03; ES = 0.479)比在业余高尔夫球手中。在针对年龄,高尔夫职业长度和训练时间控制的部分相关性中,专业的高尔夫球手的MPS评分与ESCM认知分数负相关(= -0.30,<0.001)。专业的高尔夫球手的平均高尔夫差点与MPS总相关联(= 0.33,<0.01)。总共,寻求达到高水平性能的高尔夫球手必须考虑打高尔夫球的心理方面,并找到最大化承诺水平的方法,同时最大限度地减少完美主义性状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号