首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>EFSA Journal >Scientific Opinion about the Guidance of the Chemical Regulation Directorate (UK) on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted analysed and used in regulatory assessments
【2h】

Scientific Opinion about the Guidance of the Chemical Regulation Directorate (UK) on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted analysed and used in regulatory assessments

机译:关于英国化学法规局关于如何进行农药老化吸附研究的指导的科学意见

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues reviewed the guidance on how aged sorption studies for pesticides should be conducted, analysed and used in regulatory assessment. The inclusion of aged sorption is a higher tier in the groundwater leaching assessment. The Panel based its review on a test with three substances taken from a data set provided by the European Crop Protection Association. Particular points of attention were the quality of the data provided, the proposed fitting procedure of aged sorption experiments and the proposed method for combining results obtained from aged sorption studies and lower‐tier studies on degradation and adsorption. Aged sorption was a relevant process in all cases studied. The test revealed that the guidance could generally be well applied and resulted in robust and plausible results. The Panel considers the guidance suitable for use in the groundwater leaching assessment after the recommendations in this Scientific Opinion have been implemented, with the exception of the use of field data to derive aged sorption parameters. The Panel noted that the draft guidance could only be used by experienced users because there is no software tool that fully supports the work flow in the guidance document. It is therefore recommended that a user‐friendly software tool be developed. Aged sorption lowered the predicted concentration in groundwater. However, because aged sorption experiments may be conducted in different soils than lower‐tier degradation and adsorption experiments, it cannot be guaranteed that the higher tier predicts lower concentrations than the lower tier, while lower tiers should be more conservative than higher tiers. To mitigate this problem, the Panel recommends using all available higher‐ and lower‐tier data in the leaching assessment. The Panel further recommends that aged sorption parameters for metabolites be derived only from metabolite‐dosed studies. The formation fraction can be derived from parent‐dosed degradation studies, provided that the parent and metabolite are fitted with the best‐fit model, which is the double first‐order in parallel model in the case of aged sorption.
机译:植物保护产品及其残留物小组审查了有关应如何进行农药的老化吸附研究,进行分析并用于监管评估的指南。在地下水浸出评估中,老化吸附是更高的层次。专家小组的审查基于对三种物质的测试,该测试来自欧洲作物保护协会提供的数据集。尤其要注意的是所提供数据的质量,拟议的老化吸附实验的程序以及拟议的将老化吸附研究和降解和吸附的较低层研究的结果相结合的方法。在所有研究的案例中,老化吸附都是一个相关过程。该测试表明,该指南通常可以很好地应用,并产生可靠而合理的结果。实施本《科学意见》中的建议后,专家小组会考虑适用于地下水浸出评估的指南,但使用田间数据得出老化的吸附参数除外。小组注意到,指南草案只能由有经验的用户使用,因为指南文件中没有软件可以完全支持工作流程。因此,建议开发一种用户友好的软件工具。老化的吸附降低了地下水中的预测浓度。但是,由于老化的吸附实验可能与较低层的降解和吸附实验在不同的土壤中进行,因此不能保证较高的层比较低的层预测更低的浓度,而较低的层应该比较高的层更保守。为了减轻这个问题,小组建议在浸出评估中使用所有可用的上层和下层数据。专家小组进一步建议仅从代谢物剂量研究得出代谢物的老化吸附参数。如果母体和代谢物符合最佳拟合模型,则形成比例可从母体进行的降解研究中得出,如果老化吸附,则该模型是平行模型中的双重一阶模型。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号