首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Vision >The Dominant Eye: Dominant for Parvo- But Not for Magno-Biased Stimuli?
【2h】

The Dominant Eye: Dominant for Parvo- But Not for Magno-Biased Stimuli?

机译:占主导地位的眼睛:对细小支配者占主导地位但对偏磁的刺激却不占主导地位?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Eye dominance is often defined as a preference for the visual input of one eye to the other. Implicit in this definition is the dominant eye has better visual function. Several studies have investigated the effect of visual direction or defocus on ocular dominance, but there is less evidence connecting ocular dominance and monocular visual thresholds. We used the classic “hole in card” method to determine the dominant eye for 28 adult observers (11 males and 17 females). We then compared contrast thresholds between the dominant and non-dominant eyes using grating stimuli biased to be processed more strongly either by the magnocellular (MC) or parvocellular (PC) pathway. Using non-parametric mean rank tests, the dominant eye was more sensitive overall than the non-dominant eye to both stimuli (z = −2.54, = 0.01). The dominant eye was also more sensitive to the PC-biased stimulus (z = −2.22, = 0.03) but not the MC-biased stimulus (z = −1.16, = 0.25). We discuss the clinical relevance of these results as well as the implications for parallel visual pathways.
机译:眼睛优势通常被定义为一只眼睛向另一只眼睛的视觉输入的偏好。在这个定义中隐含的是优势眼具有更好的视觉功能。几项研究调查了视觉方向或散焦对眼部优势的影响,但很少有证据证明眼部优势和单眼视觉阈值之间存在联系。我们使用经典的“插入式”方法确定28位成人观察者(11位男性和17位女性)的优势眼。然后,我们比较了偏眼和非偏眼之间的对比阈值,这些偏斜阈值使用偏斜的刺激来偏向于通过巨细胞(MC)或小细胞(PC)途径进行处理。使用非参数平均等级检验,优势眼总体上比非优势眼对两种刺激都更为敏感(z = -2.54,= 0.01)。优势眼也对PC偏置的刺激更敏感(z = -2.22,= 0.03),而对MC偏置的刺激则不敏感(z = -1.16,= 0.25)。我们讨论了这些结果的临床意义以及对平行视觉通路的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号