首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Materials >Are Metal-Free Monolithic Crowns the Present of Prosthesis? Study of Mechanical Behaviour
【2h】

Are Metal-Free Monolithic Crowns the Present of Prosthesis? Study of Mechanical Behaviour

机译:无金属单片牙冠是假体的存在吗?机械行为研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose: To analyze in vitro the mechanical behavior of five types of complete coverage crowns fabricated from different materials. Materials and methods: Seventy-five full coverage crowns were divided into five groups according to material: Group I, metal core with feldspathic ceramic covering (MC- control group); Group II, zirconia core with feldspathic ceramic covering (CZ); Group III, tetragonal monolithic zirconia (TMZ); Group IV, cubic monolithic zirconia (CMZ); Group V, high molecular weight polymethyl methacrylate (PMMAG) doped with graphene nanoparticles. All crowns underwent in vitro fatiguing by dynamic loading in wet conditions to simulate the masticatory forces to which prosthodontic materials are subject in the oral medium. Lastly, fracture resistance was evaluated by static compression testing. Results: The fracture resistance values obtained were as follows: Group MC, 2443.6 ± 238.6 N; Group CZ, 2095.4 ± 329.2 N; Group TMZ, 2494.6 ± 236.6 N; Group CMZ, 1523.6 ± 325.2 N; and Group PMMAG, 1708.9 ± 386.6 N. Group MC presented higher strength with statistically significant differences in comparison with Groups CZ ( = 0.002), CMZ ( < 0.001), and PMMAG ( < 0.001). Weibull distribution showed less probability of cumulative biomechanical failure in Groups MC and TMZ. Conclusions: Metal-ceramic and tetragonal zirconia showed high fracture resistance, while cubic zirconia and PMMA doped with graphene nanoparticles obtained lower values.
机译:目的:在体外分析由不同材料制成的五种完全覆盖的牙冠的机械性能。材料和方法:根据材料将75个全覆盖冠冠分为五组:第一组,长石质陶瓷覆盖的金属芯(MC-对照组);第二类,氧化锆芯,长石质陶瓷覆盖层(CZ); III族四方整体氧化锆(TMZ); IV组,立方整体氧化锆(CMZ); V族,掺杂有石墨烯纳米粒子的高分子量聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMAG)。通过在潮湿条件下动态加载对所有冠进行体外疲劳试验,以模拟口腔介质中修复材料经受的咀嚼力。最后,通过静态压缩试验评估抗断裂性。结果:获得的断裂抗力值如下:MC组,2443.6±238.6N; CZ组2095.4±329.2 N; TMZ组,2494.6±236.6N; CMZ组,1523.6±325.2 N; MC组为1708.9±386.6N。与CZ组(= 0.002),CMZ(<0.001)和PMMAG(<0.001)相比,MC组具有更高的强度,具有统计学上的显着差异。威布尔分布显示MC和TMZ组中累积生物力学故障的可能性较小。结论:金属陶瓷和四方氧化锆显示出较高的抗断裂性,而掺杂石墨烯纳米粒子的立方氧化锆和PMMA的断裂值较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号