首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >A Visual Scan Analysis Protocol for Postural Assessment at School in Young Students
【2h】

A Visual Scan Analysis Protocol for Postural Assessment at School in Young Students

机译:青年学生在学校姿势评估的视觉扫描分析协议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the X-ray diagnosis with a non-invasive method for spine alignment assessment adopting a visual scan analysis with a plumb line and simetograph in middle-school students. The sample of this study was composed of 31 males and 50 females with an average age of 14.23 (± 3.11) years. The visual scan analysis was assessed at a school; whereas, the X-ray was performed in a hospital. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess the differences between methods and scoliosis classifications (non-accentuated <10º and scoliosis >10º), and the Kappa was used to assess the agreement between methods. The comparisons between the methods revealed non-significant differences (z = −0.577; = 0.564), with almost perfect agreement between tests (K = 0.821; < 0.001). Moreover, no statistical significance was observed between methods by the scoliosis classification (z = −1.000; = 0.317), with almost perfect agreement between tests (K = 0.888; < 0.001). This research supports the conclusion that there are no significant differences between the two methods. Therefore, it should be highlighted that this field test should be used by physical education teachers in their classes, or in a school context, in order to determine misalignments or scoliosis prevalence among middle-school students.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较中学生采用X射线诊断法和无铅法进行脊柱对准评估的方法,该方法采用带有铅垂线和simetograph的视觉扫描分析。这项研究的样本由31位男性和50位女性组成,平均年龄为14.23(±3.11)岁。视觉扫描分析是在学校评估的;而X射线是在医院进行的。 Wilcoxon秩和检验用于评估方法和脊柱侧弯分类(非加强型<10º和脊柱侧弯>10º)之间的差异,而Kappa用于评估方法之间的一致性。方法之间的比较显示无显着差异(z = -0.577; = 0.564),测试之间几乎完全吻合(K = 0.821; <0.001)。此外,通过脊柱侧弯分类法在各方法之间未观察到统计学显着性(z = -1.000; = 0.317),各试验之间几乎完全一致(K = 0.888; <0.001)。这项研究支持以下结论:两种方法之间没有显着差异。因此,应该强调的是,体育教师应在课堂上或学校环境中使用此现场测试,以确定中学生的错位或脊柱侧弯患病率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号