首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Factors Affecting Treatment with Life-Saving Interventions Computed Tomography Scans and Specialist Consultations
【2h】

Factors Affecting Treatment with Life-Saving Interventions Computed Tomography Scans and Specialist Consultations

机译:挽救生命的干预措施计算机断层扫描和专家咨询会影响治疗的因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Emergency treatments determined by emergency physicians may affect mortality and patient satisfaction. This paper attempts to examine the impact of patient characteristics, health status, the accredited level of hospitals, and triaged levels on the following emergency treatments: immediate life-saving interventions (LSIs), computed tomography (CT) scans, and specialist consultations (SCs). A multivariate logistic regression model was employed to analyze the impact of patient characteristics, including sex, age, income and the urbanization degree of the patient’s residence; patient health status, including records of hospitalization and the number of instances of ambulatory care in the previous year; the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score; the accredited level of hospitals; and the triaged level of emergency treatments. All the patient characteristics were found to impact receiving LSI, CT and SC, except for income. Furthermore, a better health status was associated with a decreased probability of receiving LSI, CT and SC, but the number of instances of ambulatory care was not found to have a significant impact on receiving CT or SC. This study also found no evidence to support impact of CCI on SC. Hospitals with higher accredited levels were associated with a greater chance of patients receiving emergency treatments of LSI, CT and SC. A higher assigned severity (lower triaged level) led to an increased probability of receiving CT and SC. In terms of LSI, patients assigned to level 4 were found to have a lower chance of treatment than those assigned to level 5. This study found that several patient characteristics, patient health status, the accredited level of medical institutions and the triaged level, were associated with a higher likelihood of receiving emergency treatments. This study suggests that the inequality of medical resources among medical institutions with different accredited levels may yield a crowding-out effect.
机译:急诊医师确定的急诊治疗方法可能会影响死亡率和患者满意度。本文尝试检查患者特征,健康状况,医院的认可水平和三级分类对以下紧急治疗的影响:紧急救生干预措施(LSIs),计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描和专家咨询(SCs) )。采用多因素logistic回归模型分析患者特征的影响,包括性别,年龄,收入和患者居住城市化程度。患者的健康状况,包括住院记录和上一年的门诊次数;查尔森合并症指数(CCI)得分;医院的认可水平;以及紧急治疗的分类等级。发现所有患者特征都对收入,接收LSI,CT和SC产生影响。此外,更好的健康状况与接受LSI,CT和SC的可能性降低有关,但是未发现非卧床护理实例的数量对接受CT或SC有重大影响。该研究还没有发现证据支持CCI对SC的影响。认证水平较高的医院与患者接受LSI,CT和SC紧急治疗的机会更大。较高的指定严重性(较低的分类标准)导致接收CT和SC的可能性增加。就LSI而言,发现分配给第4级的患者比接受分配给第5级的患者具有更低的治疗机会。这项研究发现,以下几个患者特征,患者健康状况,医疗机构的认可水平和分类级别是与接受紧急治疗的可能性更高有关。这项研究表明,具有不同认可水平的医疗机构之间医疗资源的不平等可能会产生挤出效应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号