首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Inquiry: A Journal of Medical Care Organization Provision and Financing >Reducing Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits in Patients With Venous Thromboembolism Using a Multicomponent Care Transition Intervention
【2h】

Reducing Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits in Patients With Venous Thromboembolism Using a Multicomponent Care Transition Intervention

机译:使用多成分护理过渡干预减少静脉血栓栓塞患者的住院和急诊就诊

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Preventing utilization of hospital and emergency department after diagnosis of venous thromboembolism is a complex problem. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of a care transition intervention on hospitalizations and emergency department visits after venous thromboembolism. We randomized adults diagnosed with a new episode of venous thromboembolism to usual care or a multicomponent intervention that included a home pharmacist visit in the week after randomization (typically occurring at time of discharge), illustrated medication instructions distributed during home visit, and a follow-up phone call with an anticoagulation expert scheduled for 8 to 30 days from time of randomization. Through physician chart review of the 90 days following randomization, we measured the incidence rate of hospital and emergency department visits for each group and their ratio. We also determined which visits were related to recurrent venous thromboembolism, bleeding, or anticoagulation and which where preventable. We enrolled 77 intervention and 85 control patients. The incidence rate was 4.50 versus 6.01 visits per 1000 patient days in the intervention versus control group (incidence rate ratio = 0.71; 95% confidence interval = 0.40-1.27). Most visits in the control group were not related to venous thromboembolism or bleeding (21%) and of those that were, most were not preventable (25%). The adjusted incidence rate ratio for the intervention was 1.05 (95% confidence interval = 0.57-1.91). Our patients had a significant number of hospital and emergency department visits after diagnosis. Most visits were not related to recurrent venous thromboembolism or bleeding and of those that were, most were not preventable. Our multicomponent intervention did not decrease hospitalizations and emergency department visits.
机译:诊断静脉血栓栓塞后阻止医院和急诊科的利用是一个复杂的问题。这项研究的目的是评估静脉血栓栓塞后,护理过渡干预措施对住院和急诊就诊的影响。我们将被诊断患有静脉血栓栓塞新发作的成年人随机分配至常规护理或多成分干预措施,包括随机分组后一周内(通常在出院时)进行家庭药剂师拜访,例示性的在家访期间分发的用药说明以及以下内容:安排从随机化时间开始的8到30天与抗凝专家通话。通过随机分组后90天的医师图表审查,我们测量了每组医院和急诊就诊的发生率及其比例。我们还确定了哪些就诊与复发性静脉血栓栓塞,出血或抗凝有关,哪些可以预防。我们招募了77名干预患者和85名对照患者。干预组与对照组的发病率是每1000个患者天4.50次访视与6.01次访视(发生率比= 0.71; 95%置信区间= 0.40-1.27)。对照组中的大多数访视与静脉血栓栓塞或出血无关(21%),而在大多数情况下,则是不可预防的(25%)。干预的调整后发生率是1.05(95%置信区间= 0.57-1.91)。诊断后,我们的患者进行了大量的医院和急诊就诊。大多数访视与复发性静脉血栓栓塞或出血无关,其中大多数是无法预防的。我们的多方面干预措施并未减少住院和急诊就诊的机会。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号