首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Bioinformatics >Testing the advantages and disadvantages of short- and long- read eukaryotic metagenomics using simulated reads
【2h】

Testing the advantages and disadvantages of short- and long- read eukaryotic metagenomics using simulated reads

机译:使用模拟读物测试短读和长读真核宏基因组学的优缺点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recall is consistently higher in bacteria and fungi than plants or animals for both short Illumina and Nanopore reads. Each panel shows recall for the different kingdoms. Median recall at the genus level across each panel is shown by blue (Nanopore) or red (PacBio), and black (Illumina). Dashed lines indicate recall rates for reads classified using Kraken2; solid for reads classified using BLAST. Illumina reads exhibit consistently higher recall, followed by PacBio; bacteria and fungi exhibit higher recall than plants or animals
机译:对于Illumina和Nanopore的短读,细菌和真菌的召回率始终高于植物或动物。每个面板均显示不同王国的召回情况。蓝色(Nanopore)或红色(PacBio)和黑色(Illumina)表示每个面板的属水平的中位召回率。虚线表示使用Kraken2分类的读物的召回率;对于使用BLAST分类的读取,为固体。 Illumina的读物始终具有更高的召回率,其次是PacBio。细菌和真菌的召回率高于植物或动物

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号