首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Reductions in Emissions of Carbonaceous Particulate Matter and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Combustion of Biomass Pellets in Comparisonwith Raw Fuel Burning
【2h】

Reductions in Emissions of Carbonaceous Particulate Matter and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Combustion of Biomass Pellets in Comparisonwith Raw Fuel Burning

机译:削减碳质颗粒物和多环芳烃生物质颗粒燃烧的排放Comparisonwith原燃料燃烧

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Biomass pellets are emerging as a cleaner alternative to traditional biomass fuels. The potential benefits of using biomass pellets include improving energy utilization efficiency and reducing emissions of air pollutants. To assess the environmental, climate, and health significance of replacing traditional fuels with biomass pellets, it is critical to measure the emission factors (EFs) of various pollutants from pellet burning. However, only a few field measurements have been conducted on the emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter (PM), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from the combustion of pellets. In this study, pine wood and corn straw pellets were burned in a pellet burner (2.6 kW) and the EFs of CO, organic carbon, elemental carbon, PM, and PAHs (EFCO, EFOC, EFEC, EFPM, and EFPAH) were determined. The average EFCO, EFOC, EFEC, and EFPM were 1520±1170, 8.68±11.4, 11.2±8.7, and 188±87 mg/MJ for corn straw pellets, and 266±137, 5.74±7.17, 2.02±1.57, and 71.0±54.0 mg/MJ for pine wood pellets, respectively. Total carbonaceous carbon constituted 8 to 14% of the PM mass emitted. The measured values of EFPAH for the two pellets were 1.02±0.64 and 0.506±0.360 mg/MJ, respectively. The secondary side air supply in the pellet burner did not change the EFs of most pollutants significantly (p > 0.05). The only exceptions were EFOC and EFPM for pine wood pellets because of reduced combustion temperatures with the increased air supply. In comparison with EFs for the raw pine wood and corn straw, EFCO, EFOC, EFEC, and EFPM for pellets were significantly lower than those for raw fuels (p < 0.05). However, the differences in EFPAH were not significant (p > 0.05). Based on the measured EFs and thermal efficiencies, it was estimated that 95, 98, 98, 88, and 71% reductions in the total emissions of CO, OC, EC, PM, and PAHs could be achieved by replacing the raw biomass fuels combusted in traditional cooking stoves with pellets burned in modern pellet burners.
机译:生物质颗粒作为传统生物质燃料的清洁剂替代品。使用生物质颗粒的潜在益处包括提高能量利用效率和减少空气污染物的排放。为了评估用生物质颗粒取代传统燃料的环境,气候和健康意义,从颗粒燃烧中测量各种污染物的排放因子(EF)至关重要。然而,仅在颗粒燃烧中对一氧化碳(CO),颗粒物质(PM),颗粒状物质(PM)和多环芳烃(PAH)进行了几种田间测量。在本研究中,确定松木和玉米秸秆颗粒在颗粒燃烧器(2.6 kW)中燃烧,并且确定了CO,有机碳,元素碳,PM和PAH(EFCO,EFOC,EFEC,EFPM和EFPAH)的EFS 。平均EFCO,EFOC,EFEC和EFPM为1520±1170,8.68±11.4,11.2±8.7和188±87 mg / MJ,用于玉米秸秆粒料,266±137,5.74±7.17,2.02±1.57和71.0松木颗粒的±54.0 mg / mg / mj。总碳质碳占PM批量的8-14%。两种颗粒的EFPAH的测量值分别为1.02±0.64和0.506±0.360 mg / mJ。颗粒燃烧器中的次级侧空气供应不会显着改变大多数污染物的EFS(P> 0.05)。由于燃烧温度降低,唯一的例外是EFOC和EFPM,因为燃烧温度降低了空气供应。与原松木和玉米秸秆的EFS相比,粒料粒料,EFCO,EFOC,EFEC和EFPM显着低于原料燃料(P <0.05)。然而,EF pah 的差异不显着(p> 0.05)。基于测量的EFS和热效率,估计通过更换燃烧的原料生物质燃料,可以实现95,98,98,88和71%的减少,可以通过更换燃烧的原料生物量燃料来实现CO,OC,EC,PM和PAHS的总排放在传统的烹饪炉中,颗粒在现代颗粒燃烧器中烧毁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号