首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Evaluation of the Unique and Specific Contributions of Dimensions of the Triple Vulnerability Model to the Prediction of DSM-IV Anxiety and Mood Disorder Constructs
【2h】

Evaluation of the Unique and Specific Contributions of Dimensions of the Triple Vulnerability Model to the Prediction of DSM-IV Anxiety and Mood Disorder Constructs

机译:独特的评价并Dsm-IV焦虑心境障碍构建体的预测三重漏洞模型的尺寸的具体贡献

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The triple vulnerability model (, ) posits that three vulnerabilities contribute to the etiology of emotional disorders: (1) general biological vulnerability (i.e., dimensions of temperament such as neuroticism and extraversion); (2) general psychological vulnerability (i.e., perceived control over life stress and emotional states); (3) disorder-specific psychological vulnerability (e.g., thought-action fusion for obsessive-compulsive disorder, OCD). Despite the prominence of this model, a comprehensive empirical evaluation has not yet been undertaken. The current study used structural equation modeling to test the triple vulnerability model in a large clinical sample (N = 700), focusing on vulnerabilities for depression, social phobia, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and OCD. Specifically, we examined the incremental prediction of each level of the triple vulnerability model for each disorder, with the following putative disorder-specific psychological vulnerabilities: thought-action fusion (TAF) for OCD, the dysfunctional attitudes (DAS) for depression, and intolerance of uncertainty (IoU) for GAD. In the final model that included all three levels of vulnerabilities, neuroticism had significant direct effects on all four disorder constructs, and extraversion was inversely associated with depression and social phobia. However, perceived control was significantly associated with GAD and OCD only. Of the disorder-specific psychological vulnerabilities, TAF was significantly and specifically related to OCD. In contrast, DAS and IoU were not significant predictors of depression and GAD respectively, instead contributing to other disorders. The results are discussed in regard to structural models of the emotional disorders and the various roles of general and specific vulnerability dimensions in the onset, severity, and temporal course of psychopathology.
机译:三重脆弱性模型(,)认为,三个脆弱性是造成情绪障碍的原因:(1)一般的生物学脆弱性(即,气质的维度,例如神经质和外向性); (2)一般的心理脆弱性(即对生活压力和情绪状态的感知控制); (3)特定于疾病的心理脆弱性(例如,强迫症的思想行为融合,强迫症)。尽管该模型非常突出,但尚未进行全面的经验评估。当前的研究使用结构方程模型来测试大型临床样本(N = 700)中的三重脆弱性模型,重点是抑郁症,社交恐惧症,广泛性焦虑症(GAD)和OCD的脆弱性。具体来说,我们研究了每种疾病的三重脆弱性模型每个水平的增量预测,以及以下假定的特定疾病的心理脆弱性:OCD的思想行动融合(TAF),抑郁症的功能障碍态度(DAS)和不宽容GAD的不确定性(IoU)。在包含所有三个级别的漏洞的最终模型中,神经质对所有四个障碍的构成都有明显的直接影响,外向性与抑郁和社交恐惧症呈负相关。但是,知觉控制仅与GAD和OCD显着相关。在特定疾病的心理脆弱性中,TAF与强迫症显着且具体相关。相比之下,DAS和IoU分别不是抑郁症和GAD的重要预测指标,而是导致其他疾病的原因。讨论了有关情绪障碍的结构模型以及一般和特定脆弱性维度在心理病理学的发作,严重程度和时间过程中的各种作用的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号