首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Different Traits Determine Introduction Naturalization and Invasion Success In Woody Plants: Proteaceae as a Test Case
【2h】

Different Traits Determine Introduction Naturalization and Invasion Success In Woody Plants: Proteaceae as a Test Case

机译:不同性状决定木本植物的引种归化和入侵成功:以Proteaceae作为测试案例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A major aim of invasion ecology is to identify characteristics of successful invaders. However, most plant groups studied in detail (e.g. pines and acacias) have a high percentage of invasive taxa. Here we examine the global introduction history and invasion ecology of Proteaceae—a large plant family with many taxa that have been widely disseminated by humans, but with few known invaders. To do this we compiled a global list of species and used boosted regression tree models to assess which factors are important in determining the status of a species (not introduced, introduced, naturalized or invasive).At least 402 of 1674 known species (24%) have been moved by humans out of their native ranges, 58 species (14%) have become naturalized but not invasive, and 8 species (2%) are invasive. The probability of naturalization was greatest for species with large native ranges, low susceptibility to Phytophthora root-rot fungus, large mammal-dispersed seeds, and with the capacity to resprout. The probability of naturalized species becoming invasive was greatest for species with large native ranges, those used as barrier plants, tall species, species with small seeds, and serotinous species.The traits driving invasiveness of Proteaceae were similar to those for acacias and pines. However, while some traits showed a consistent influence at introduction, naturalization and invasion, others appear to be influential at one stage only, and some have contrasting effects at different stages. Trait-based analyses therefore need to consider different invasion stages separately. On their own, these observations provide little predictive power for risk assessment, but when the causative mechanisms are understood (e.g. Phytophthora susceptibility) they provide valuable insights. As such there is considerable value in seeking the correlates and mechanisms underlying invasions for particular taxonomic or functional groups.
机译:入侵生态学的主要目的是确定成功入侵者的特征。但是,大多数经过详细研究的植物组(例如,松树和阿拉伯树胶)具有很高的入侵分类单元。在这里,我们考察了Proteaceae的全球引进历史和入侵生态学。Proteaceae是一个大型植物科,拥有许多已被人类广泛传播的分类单元,但鲜为人知的入侵者。为此,我们编制了物种的全球清单,并使用增强的回归树模型来评估哪些因素对确定物种(未引入,引入,归化或入侵)的状态很重要.1674个已知物种中至少有402个(24% )已被人类移出了自然保护区,有58种(14%)已归化但没有侵入性,有8种(2%)具有侵入性。对于自然分布范围广,对疫霉根腐真菌敏感性低,哺乳动物分散种子大且具有萌芽能力的物种,归化的可能性最大。本土物种入侵范围较大的物种,用作屏障植物的物种,高大物种,种子较小的物种和血清素物种的入侵物种的可能性最大。驱动Proteaceae入侵的特性与相思和松树相似。然而,尽管某些特征在引进,归化和入侵方面表现出一致的影响,但其他特征似乎仅在一个阶段具有影响力,而某些特征在不同阶段具有相反的影响。因此,基于特征的分析需要分别考虑不同的入侵阶段。这些观察结果本身无法提供风险评估的预测能力,但是当了解了病因机制(例如疫霉菌易感性)时,它们将提供有价值的见解。因此,在寻找特定分类或功能组入侵的基础和相关机制方面具有相当大的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号