首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Dynamic and Static Longitudinal Marginal Structural Working Models
【2h】

Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Dynamic and Static Longitudinal Marginal Structural Working Models

机译:动态和静态纵向边际结构工作模型的目标最大似然估计

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper describes a targeted maximum likelihood estimator (TMLE) for the parameters of longitudinal static and dynamic marginal structural models. We consider a longitudinal data structure consisting of baseline covariates, time-dependent intervention nodes, intermediate time-dependent covariates, and a possibly time-dependent outcome. The intervention nodes at each time point can include a binary treatment as well as a right-censoring indicator. Given a class of dynamic or static interventions, a marginal structural model is used to model the mean of the intervention-specific counterfactual outcome as a function of the intervention, time point, and possibly a subset of baseline covariates. Because the true shape of this function is rarely known, the marginal structural model is used as a working model. The causal quantity of interest is defined as the projection of the true function onto this working model. Iterated conditional expectation double robust estimators for marginal structural model parameters were previously proposed by Robins (2000, 2002) and Bang and Robins (2005). Here we build on this work and present a pooled TMLE for the parameters of marginal structural working models. We compare this pooled estimator to a stratified TMLE (Schnitzer et al. 2014) that is based on estimating the intervention-specific mean separately for each intervention of interest. The performance of the pooled TMLE is compared to the performance of the stratified TMLE and the performance of inverse probability weighted (IPW) estimators using simulations. Concepts are illustrated using an example in which the aim is to estimate the causal effect of delayed switch following immunological failure of first line antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected patients. Data from the International Epidemiological Databases to Evaluate AIDS, Southern Africa are analyzed to investigate this question using both TML and IPW estimators. Our results demonstrate practical advantages of the pooled TMLE over an IPW estimator for working marginal structural models for survival, as well as cases in which the pooled TMLE is superior to its stratified counterpart.
机译:本文介绍了针对纵向静态和动态边际结构模型参数的目标最大似然估计器(TMLE)。我们考虑纵向数据结构,该结构由基线协变量,与时间有关的干预节点,与时间有关的中间协变量以及可能与时间有关的结果组成。每个时间点的干预节点可以包括二进制处理以及右检查指示符。给定一类动态或静态干预,将使用边际结构模型来模拟特定于干预措施的反事实结果的平均值,该平均值是干预,时间点以及基线协变量子集的函数。由于此功能的真实形状鲜为人知,因此将边际结构模型用作工作模型。感兴趣的因果量定义为真实函数在此工作模型上的投影。 Robins(2000,2002)和Bang and Robins(2005)先前提出了用于边际结构模型参数的迭代条件期望双重鲁棒估计。在这里,我们以这项工作为基础,并为边际结构工作模型的参数提供了一个汇总的TMLE。我们将这种合并的估计量与分层TMLE(Schnitzer等人,2014)进行比较,该模型基于分别针对每种感兴趣的干预措施估计特定于干预措施的均值。使用模拟将池中TMLE的性能与分层TMLE的性能以及逆概率加权(IPW)估计器的性能进行比较。举例说明了一些概念,其中的目的是评估HIV感染患者在一线抗逆转录病毒疗法的免疫学失败后延迟转换的因果关系。使用TML和IPW估算器分析了来自国际流行病学数据库以评估南部非洲艾滋病的数据,以调查此问题。我们的研究结果表明,对于工作的边际结构模型而言,合并的TMLE优于IPW估计器的实际优势,以及合并的TMLE优于分层对应模型的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号