首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >How Do Astronomers Share Data? Reliability and Persistence of Datasets Linked in AAS Publications and a Qualitative Study of Data Practices among US Astronomers
【2h】

How Do Astronomers Share Data? Reliability and Persistence of Datasets Linked in AAS Publications and a Qualitative Study of Data Practices among US Astronomers

机译:天文学家如何共享数据? AAS出版物中链接的数据集的可靠性和持久性以及美国天文学家对数据实践的定性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We analyze data sharing practices of astronomers over the past fifteen years. An analysis of URL links embedded in papers published by the American Astronomical Society reveals that the total number of links included in the literature rose dramatically from 1997 until 2005, when it leveled off at around 1500 per year. The analysis also shows that the availability of linked material decays with time: in 2011, 44% of links published a decade earlier, in 2001, were broken. A rough analysis of link types reveals that links to data hosted on astronomers' personal websites become unreachable much faster than links to datasets on curated institutional sites. To gauge astronomers' current data sharing practices and preferences further, we performed in-depth interviews with 12 scientists and online surveys with 173 scientists, all at a large astrophysical research institute in the United States: the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, in Cambridge, MA. Both the in-depth interviews and the online survey indicate that, in principle, there is no philosophical objection to data-sharing among astronomers at this institution. Key reasons that more data are not presently shared more efficiently in astronomy include: the difficulty of sharing large data sets; over reliance on non-robust, non-reproducible mechanisms for sharing data (e.g. emailing it); unfamiliarity with options that make data-sharing easier (faster) and/or more robust; and, lastly, a sense that other researchers would not want the data to be shared. We conclude with a short discussion of a new effort to implement an easy-to-use, robust, system for data sharing in astronomy, at theastrodata.org, and we analyze the uptake of that system to-date.
机译:我们分析了过去15年中天文学家的数据共享做法。对美国天文学会发表的论文中嵌入的URL链接的分析表明,从1997年到2005年,文献中包含的链接总数急剧增加,每年稳定在1500个左右。分析还显示,链接的材料的可用性随时间而下降:2011年,十年前(即2001年)发布的链接中有44%被断开。对链接类型的粗略分析显示,与托管机构站点上的数据集的链接相比,与天文学家的个人网站上托管的数据的链接变得不易访问。为了进一步评估天文学家当前的数据共享做法和偏好,我们对12位科学家进行了深入访谈,并对173位科学家进行了在线调查,这些调查全都在美国一家大型天体物理学研究所:位于剑桥的哈佛-史密森天体物理学中心进行, 嘛。深入访谈和在线调查均表明,原则上,该机构的天文学家对数据共享没有哲学上的反对。目前在天文学中尚未更有效地共享更多数据的主要原因包括:共享大型数据集的难度;过分依赖非健壮,不可复制的数据共享机制(例如通过电子邮件发送数据);不熟悉使数据共享更容易(更快)和/或更健壮的选项;最后,还有一种感觉,即其他研究人员不希望共享数据。我们在theastrodata.org上简短讨论了一项新的工作,以实现一种易于使用的,健壮的,用于天文学的数据共享系统,并分析了该系统的最新应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号