首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Extension of the Peters–Belson method to estimate health disparities among multiple groups using logistic regression with survey data
【2h】

Extension of the Peters–Belson method to estimate health disparities among multiple groups using logistic regression with survey data

机译:扩展Peters–Belson方法以使用调查数据进行逻辑回归来估计多个群体之间的健康差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Determining the extent of a disparity, if any, between groups of people, for example, race or gender, is of interest in many fields, including public health for medical treatment and prevention of disease. An observed difference in the mean outcome between an advantaged group (AG) and disadvantaged group (DG) can be due to differences in the distribution of relevant covariates. The Peters–Belson (PB) method fits a regression model with covariates to the AG to predict, for each DG member, their outcome measure as if they had been from the AG. The difference between the mean predicted and the mean observed outcomes of DG members is the (unexplained) disparity of interest. We focus on applying the PB method to estimate the disparity based on binary/multinomial/proportional odds logistic regression models using data collected from complex surveys with more than one DG. Estimators of the unexplained disparity, an analytic variance–covariance estimator that is based on the Taylor linearization variance–covariance estimation method, as well as a Wald test for testing a joint null hypothesis of zero for unexplained disparities between two or more minority groups and a majority group, are provided. Simulation studies with data selected from simple random sampling and cluster sampling, as well as the analyses of disparity in body mass index in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2004, are conducted. Empirical results indicate that the Taylor linearization variance–covariance estimation is accurate and that the proposed Wald test maintains the nominal level.
机译:确定人群之间的差异程度(如果有的话),例如种族或性别,在许多领域中都很重要,包括用于医疗保健和疾病预防的公共卫生。优势组(AG)和劣势组(DG)之间的平均结果差异可能是由于相关协变量分布的差异所致。 Peters–Belson(PB)方法将带有协变量的回归模型与AG拟合,以便为每个DG成员预测其结果度量,就好像它们来自AG。 DG成员的平均预测结果与观察到的平均结果之间的差异是(无法解释的)兴趣差异。我们专注于应用PB方法基于二元/多项式/比例赔率逻辑回归模型来估计差异,该模型使用的是从具有多个DG的复杂调查中收集的数据。无法解释的差异的估计量,基于泰勒线性化方差-协方差估计方法的分析方差-协方差估计量,以及用于检验两个或多个少数群体之间的无法解释的差异的联合零假设的Wald检验。提供多数票。进行了从简单随机抽样和整群抽样中选择的数据进行的模拟研究,以及在《 1999-2004年美国国家健康和营养检查调查》中对体重指数差异的分析。实证结果表明,泰勒线性化方差-协方差估计是准确的,并且提出的Wald检验保持名义水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号