首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A Pragmatic Approach to Assess the Exposure of the Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) When Subjected to Pesticide Spray
【2h】

A Pragmatic Approach to Assess the Exposure of the Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) When Subjected to Pesticide Spray

机译:评估农药喷洒蜜蜂(蜜蜂)暴露的实用方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Plant protection spray treatments may expose non-target organisms to pesticides. In the pesticide registration procedure, the honey bee represents one of the non-target model species for which the risk posed by pesticides must be assessed on the basis of the hazard quotient (HQ). The HQ is defined as the ratio between environmental exposure and toxicity. For the honey bee, the HQ calculation is not consistent because it corresponds to the ratio between the pesticide field rate (in mass of pesticide/ha) and LD50 (in mass of pesticide/bee). Thus, in contrast to all other species, the HQ can only be interpreted empirically because it corresponds to a number of bees/ha. This type of HQ calculation is due to the difficulty in transforming pesticide field rates into doses to which bees are exposed. In this study, we used a pragmatic approach to determine the apparent exposure surface area of honey bees submitted to pesticide treatments by spraying with a Potter-type tower. The doses received by the bees were quantified by very efficient chemical analyses, which enabled us to determine an apparent surface area of 1.05 cm2/bee. The apparent surface area was used to calculate the exposure levels of bees submitted to pesticide sprays and then to revisit the HQ ratios with a calculation mode similar to that used for all other living species. X-tomography was used to assess the physical surface area of a bee, which was 3.27 cm2/bee, and showed that the apparent exposure surface was not overestimated. The control experiments showed that the toxicity induced by doses calculated with the exposure surface area was similar to that induced by treatments according to the European testing procedure. This new approach to measure risk is more accurate and could become a tool to aid the decision-making process in the risk assessment of pesticides.
机译:植保喷雾处理可能会使非目标生物接触农药。在农药注册程序中,蜜蜂代表非目标模式物种之一,必须根据危害商(HQ)评估其农药造成的风险。总部定义为环境暴露与毒性之间的比率。对于蜜蜂,HQ计算不一致,因为它与农药田间施用率(以农药/公顷质量计)和LD50(以农药/蜜蜂的质量计)之比相对应。因此,与所有其他物种相比,HQ仅凭经验进行解释,因为它对应于蜜蜂/公顷的数量。这类HQ计算是由于难以将农药田间转化率转换为蜜蜂暴露的剂量。在这项研究中,我们采用了一种务实的方法,通过用波特型塔喷雾来确定经过农药处理的蜜蜂的表观暴露表面积。蜜蜂接受的剂量通过非常有效的化学分析进行定量,这使我们能够确定1.05 cm 2 / bee的表观表面积。表观表面积用于计算蜜蜂对农药喷洒的暴露水平,然后以类似于所有其他生物物种所用的计算模式重新计算HQ比率。 X射线断层扫描用于评估蜜蜂的物理表面积,为3.27 cm 2 / bee,表明表观暴露表面并未被高估。对照实验表明,按暴露表面积计算的剂量引起的毒性与根据欧洲测试程序的处理引起的毒性相似。这种衡量风险的新方法更加准确,可以成为辅助决策过程进行农药风险评估的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号