首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Heroes and Villains of World History across Cultures
【2h】

Heroes and Villains of World History across Cultures

机译:跨文化的世界历史的英雄和恶棍

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Emergent properties of global political culture were examined using data from the World History Survey (WHS) involving 6,902 university students in 37 countries evaluating 40 figures from world history. Multidimensional scaling and factor analysis techniques found only limited forms of universality in evaluations across Western, Catholic/Orthodox, Muslim, and Asian country clusters. The highest consensus across cultures involved scientific innovators, with Einstein having the most positive evaluation overall. Peaceful humanitarians like Mother Theresa and Gandhi followed. There was much less cross-cultural consistency in the evaluation of negative figures, led by Hitler, Osama bin Laden, and Saddam Hussein. After more traditional empirical methods (e.g., factor analysis) failed to identify meaningful cross-cultural patterns, Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was used to identify four global representational profiles: Secular and Religious Idealists were overwhelmingly prevalent in Christian countries, and Political Realists were common in Muslim and Asian countries. We discuss possible consequences and interpretations of these different representational profiles.
机译:使用来自世界历史调查(WHS)的数据,研究了全球政治文化的新兴特征,该数据涉及来自37个国家的6,902名大学生,评估了来自世界历史的40位人物。多维缩放和因子分析技术在整个西方,天主教/东正教,穆斯林和亚洲国家集群的评估中仅发现有限形式的通用性。跨文化的最高共识涉及科学创新者,而爱因斯坦总体上评价最高。随后是特蕾莎修女和甘地这样的和平人道主义者。在由希特勒,乌萨马·本·拉丹和萨达姆·侯赛因领导的负面数据评估中,跨文化的一致性要差得多。在更传统的经验方法(例如,因素分析)未能识别出有意义的跨文化模式之后,潜在特征分析(LPA)被用于识别四种全球代表性特征:世俗和宗教理想主义者在基督教国家中极为普遍,而政治现实主义者则是在穆斯林和亚洲国家很普遍。我们讨论了这些不同表示形式的可能结果和解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号