首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Plant Science >Do ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal temperate tree species systematically differ in root order-related fine root morphology and biomass?
【2h】

Do ectomycorrhizal and arbuscular mycorrhizal temperate tree species systematically differ in root order-related fine root morphology and biomass?

机译:外生菌根和丛枝菌根温带树种在根序相关的细根形态和生物量方面是否系统地不同?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While most temperate broad-leaved tree species form ectomycorrhizal (EM) symbioses, a few species have arbuscular mycorrhizas (AM). It is not known whether EM and AM tree species differ systematically with respect to fine root morphology, fine root system size and root functioning. In a species-rich temperate mixed forest, we studied the fine root morphology and biomass of three EM and three AM tree species from the genera Acer, Carpinus, Fagus, Fraxinus, and Tilia searching for principal differences between EM and AM trees. We further assessed the evidence of convergence or divergence in root traits among the six co-occurring species. Eight fine root morphological and chemical traits were investigated in root segments of the first to fourth root order in three different soil depths and the relative importance of the factors root order, tree species and soil depth for root morphology was determined. Root order was more influential than tree species while soil depth had only a small effect on root morphology All six species showed similar decreases in specific root length and specific root area from the 1st to the 4th root order, while the species patterns differed considerably in root tissue density, root N concentration, and particularly with respect to root tip abundance. Most root morphological traits were not significantly different between EM and AM species (except for specific root area that was larger in AM species), indicating that mycorrhiza type is not a key factor influencing fine root morphology in these species. The order-based root analysis detected species differences more clearly than the simple analysis of bulked fine root mass. Despite convergence in important root traits among AM and EM species, even congeneric species may differ in certain fine root morphological traits. This suggests that, in general, species identity has a larger influence on fine root morphology than mycorrhiza type.
机译:虽然大多数温带阔叶树种形成根外生菌(EM)共生,但少数树种具有丛枝菌根(AM)。尚不清楚EM和AM树种在细根形态,细根系统大小和根功能方面是否存在系统差异。在一个物种丰富的温带混交林中,我们研究了Acer,Carpinus,Fagus,Fraxinus和Tilia属的3种EM和3种AM树木的优良根系形态和生物量,以寻找EM和AM树木之间的主要差异。我们进一步评估了六个共生物种之间根性状趋同或趋异的证据。在三种不同土壤深度的第一至第四根序的根段中,研究了八个优良的根形态和化学特性,并确定了根序,树种和土壤深度等因素对根形态的相对重要性。根序比树种更具影响力,而土壤深度对根系形态的影响很小。从第1根到第4根,这6种根系的比根长和比根系面积都有相似的下降,而根系的物种格局差异很大组织密度,根N浓度,尤其是根尖的丰度。 EM和AM物种之间的大多数根系形态特征无显着差异(除了AM物种中较大的特定根系面积以外),这表明菌根类型不是影响这些物种优良根系形态的关键因素。与简单的散装细根质量分析相比,基于顺序的根分析更清楚地检测到物种差异。尽管AM和EM物种在重要的根性状上趋于一致,但即使是同类物种在某些优良的根系形态性状上也可能有所不同。这表明,与菌根类型相比,物种身份通常对细根形态的影响更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号