首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Pedagogical tools to explore Cartesian mind-body dualism in the classroom: philosophical arguments and neuroscience illusions
【2h】

Pedagogical tools to explore Cartesian mind-body dualism in the classroom: philosophical arguments and neuroscience illusions

机译:在课堂上探索笛卡尔笛卡尔身心二元论的教学工具:哲学论证和神经科学错觉

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A fundamental discussion in lower-level undergraduate neuroscience and psychology courses is Descartes’s “radical” or “mind-body” dualism. According to Descartes, our thinking mind, the res cogitans, is separate from the body as physical matter or substance, the res extensa. Since the transmission of sensory stimuli from the body to the mind is a physical capacity shared with animals, it can be confused, misled, or uncertain (e.g., bodily senses imply that ice and water are different substances). True certainty thus arises from within the mind and its capacity to doubt physical stimuli. Since this doubting mind is a thinking thing that is distinct from bodily stimuli, truth and certainty are reached through the doubting mind as cogito ergo sum, or the certainty of itself as it thinks: hence Descartes’s famous maxim, I think, therefore I am. However, in the last century of Western philosophy, with nervous system investigation, and with recent advances in neuroscience, the potential avenues to explore student’s understanding of the epistemology and effects of Cartesian mind-body dualism has expanded. This article further explores this expansion, highlighting pedagogical practices and tools instructors can use to enhance a psychology student’s understanding of Cartesian dualistic epistemology, in order to think more critically about its implicit assumptions and effects on learning. It does so in two ways: first, by offering instructors an alternative philosophical perspective to dualistic thinking: a mind-body holism that is antithetical to the assumed binaries of dualistic epistemology. Second, it supplements this philosophical argument with a practical component: simple mind-body illusions that instructors may use to demonstrate contrary epistemologies to students. Combining these short philosophical and neuroscience arguments thereby acts as a pedagogical tool to open new conceptual spaces within which learning may occur.
机译:笛卡尔的“激进”或“身心”二元论是较低层次的本科神经科学和心理学课程的基本讨论。根据笛卡尔所说,我们的思维思想,即抵抗力(res cogitans),是作为物质或物质(即抗力延伸)与身体分离的。由于感觉刺激从身体到大脑的传递是动物所共有的一种物理能力,因此可能会感到困惑,误导或不确定(例如,身体感觉暗示冰和水是不同的物质)。因此,真正的确定性来自于内心深处及其怀疑身体刺激的能力。由于这种怀疑思维是一种与身体刺激不同的思维事物,因此通过怀疑思维(如cogito ergo sum或它所认为的自身确定性)可以达到真理和确定性:因此,笛卡尔的著名格言是,我想,所以我是。但是,在上个世纪的西方哲学中,随着神经系统研究的发展以及神经科学的最新发展,探索学生对认识论和笛卡尔笛卡尔身心二元论的理解的潜在途径得以扩展。本文将进一步探讨这种扩展,重点介绍教师可以用来增强心理学学生对笛卡尔二元认识论的理解的教学实践和工具,以便更批判性地思考其隐含假设和对学习的影响。它以两种方式做到这一点:首先,通过为教师提供二元思考的另一种哲学视角:与二元认识论的假定二元对立的心身整体主义。其次,它以一种实用的成分对这一哲学论点进行了补充:教师可以用来向学生展示相反的认识论的简单的身心错觉。因此,将这些简短的哲学和神经科学论证相结合,可以作为一种教学工具,以打开可能发生学习的新概念空间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号