首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The neurosciences and the search for a unified psychology: the science and esthetics of a single framework
【2h】

The neurosciences and the search for a unified psychology: the science and esthetics of a single framework

机译:神经科学与统一心理学的探索:单一框架的科学与美学

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The search for a so-called unified or integrated theory has long served as a goal for some psychologists, even if the search is often implicit. But if the established sciences do not have an explicitly unified set of theories, then why should psychology? After examining this question again I argue that psychology is in fact reasonably unified around its methods and its commitment to functional explanations, an indeterminate functionalism. The question of the place of the neurosciences in this framework is complex. On the one hand, the neuroscientific project will not likely renew and synthesize the disparate arms of psychology. On the other hand, their reformulation of what it means to be human will exert an influence in multiple ways. One way to capture that influence is to conceptualize the brain in terms of a technology that we interact with in a manner that we do not yet fully understand. In this way we maintain both a distance from neuro-reductionism and refrain from committing to an unfettered subjectivity.
机译:即使对于某些心理学家来说,寻找所谓的统一或集成理论长期以来一直是他们的目标。但是,如果已建立的科学没有一套明确统一的理论,那么为什么要心理学呢?在再次研究了这个问题之后,我认为心理学实际上在其方法及其对功能性解释的承诺上是合理统一的,这是一种不确定的功能主义。神经科学在此框架中的位置问题很复杂。一方面,神经科学计划不可能更新和综合各种心理学。另一方面,他们对人的意义的重新表述将以多种方式施加影响。捕捉这种影响的一种方法是根据我们尚未完全理解的方式与之交互的技术来概念化大脑。通过这种方式,我们既与神经还原论保持距离,又避免致力于不受约束的主观性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号