首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Kidney-Sparing Methods for Extended-Field Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (EF-IMRT) in Cervical Carcinoma Treatment
【2h】

Kidney-Sparing Methods for Extended-Field Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (EF-IMRT) in Cervical Carcinoma Treatment

机译:保留肾脏的方法用于宫颈癌大范围调强放疗(EF-IMRT)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Coplanar extended-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (EF-IMRT) targeting the whole-pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with advanced cervical cancer results in impaired creatinine clearance. An improvement in renal function cannot be expected unless low-dose (approximately 10 Gy) kidney exposure is reduced. The dosimetric method should be considered during EF-IMRT planning to further reduce low-dose exposure to the kidneys. To assess the usefulness of non-coplanar EF-IMRT with kidney-avoiding beams to spare the kidneys during cervical carcinoma treatment in dosimetric analysis between non-coplanar and coplanar EF-IMRT, we compared the doses of the target organ and organs at risk, including the kidney, in 10 consecutive patients. To estimate the influence of EFRT on renal dysfunction, creatinine clearance values after treatment were also examined in 18 consecutive patients. Of these 18 patients, 10 patients who were included in the dosimetric analysis underwent extended field radiation therapy (EFRT) with concurrent chemotherapy, and eight patients underwent whole-pelvis radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy to treat cervical carcinoma between April 2012 and March 2015 at our institution. In the dosimetric analysis, non-coplanar EF-IMRT was effective at reducing low-dose (approximately 10 Gy) exposure to the kidneys, thus maintaining target coverage and sparing other organs at risk, such as the small bowel, rectum, and bladder, compared with coplanar EF-IMRT. Renal function in all 10 patients who underwent EFRT, including coplanar EF-IMRT (with kidney irradiation), was low after treatment, and differed significantly from that of the eight patients who underwent WPRT (no kidney irradiation) 6 months after the first day of treatment (P = 0.005). In conclusion, non-coplanar EF-IMRT should be considered in patients with advanced cervical cancer, particularly in patients with a long life expectancy or with pre-existing renal dysfunction.
机译:针对患有晚期宫颈癌的患者的整个盆腔和主动脉旁淋巴结进行共面扩展场强度调制放射治疗(EF-IMRT)会导致肌酐清除率受损。除非减少低剂量(约10 Gy)的肾脏暴露,否则无法预期肾脏功能会有所改善。在EF-IMRT规划过程中应考虑剂量学方法,以进一步减少低剂量肾脏暴露。为了在非共面和共面EF-IMRT之间的剂量分析中评估非共面EF-IMRT和避免肾脏束对宫颈癌治疗期间肾脏的有用性,我们比较了目标器官和处于危险中的器官的剂量,连续10例患者包括肾脏在内。为了评估EFRT对肾功能不全的影响,还对连续18例患者的治疗后肌酐清除率值进行了检查。在这18例患者中,我们在2012年4月至2015年3月期间,将10例接受剂量学分析的患者接受了大范围放射治疗(EFRT)并发化疗,另外8例接受了全盆腔放射治疗并发化疗来治疗宫颈癌。机构。在剂量分析中,非共面EF-IMRT可以有效减少肾脏的低剂量(约10 Gy)暴露,从而保持靶标覆盖范围,并避免其他风险器官,例如小肠,直肠和膀胱,与共面EF-IMRT相比。在治疗后的第一天,所有10例接受EFRT的患者(包括共面EF-IMRT(接受肾脏照射))的肾功能均很低,并且与八名接受WPRT(未接受肾脏照射)的患者的肾功能显着不同。治疗(P = 0.005)。总之,晚期宫颈癌患者应考虑非共面EF-IMRT,特别是预期寿命长或已有肾功能不全的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号