首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >A single-institution comparison of cetuximab carboplatin and paclitaxel induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation (CRT) versus CRT for locally-advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN)
【2h】

A single-institution comparison of cetuximab carboplatin and paclitaxel induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation (CRT) versus CRT for locally-advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN)

机译:西妥昔单抗卡铂和紫杉醇诱导化疗后放化疗(CRT)与CRT局部治疗头颈部鳞状细胞癌(LA-SCCHN)的单机构比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

ObjectivesComparisons of induction chemotherapy (IC) against upfront chemoradiation (CRT) for locally advanced head and neck cancer (LA-HNSCC) have demonstrated no differences except greater toxicity with IC. Effective induction regimens that are less toxic are therefore warranted. To inform future efforts with IC, we present our institutional experience comparing a less toxic IC regimen to CRT.
机译:目的比较局部晚期头颈癌(LA-HNSCC)与前期化学放射疗法(CRT)的诱导化学疗法(IC)的比较,除了IC的更大毒性外,没有其他差异。因此,需要有毒性较低的有效诱导方案。为了向IC的未来工作提供信息,我们将比较毒性较小的IC方案与CRT的经验结合我们的经验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号