首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The Effects of Secret Instructions and Yeso Questions on Maltreated and Non-maltreated Children’s Reports of a Minor Transgression
【2h】

The Effects of Secret Instructions and Yeso Questions on Maltreated and Non-maltreated Children’s Reports of a Minor Transgression

机译:秘密指示和是/否问题对受虐儿童和未受虐儿童轻微犯罪的报告的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study examined the effects of secret instructions (distinguishing between good/bad secrets and encouraging disclosure of bad secrets) and yeso questions (DID: “Did the toy break?” versus DYR: “Do you remember if the toy broke?”) on 262 maltreated and non-maltreated children’s (age range 4–9 years) reports of a minor transgression. Over two-thirds of children failed to disclose the transgression in response to free recall (invitations and cued invitations). The secret instruction increased disclosures early in free recall, but was not superior to no instruction when combined with cued invitations. Yeso questions specifically asking about the transgression elicited disclosures from almost half of the children who had not previously disclosed, and false alarms were rare. DYR questions led to ambiguous responding among a substantial percentage of children, particularly younger children. The findings highlight the difficulties of eliciting transgression disclosures without direct questions
机译:这项研究检查了秘密指示(区分好/坏秘密并鼓励披露坏秘密)和是/否问题(DID:“玩具坏了吗?”与DYR:“您还记得玩具是否坏了吗?”的影响)的影响。 )报告了262起虐待和未虐待儿童(年龄4-9岁)的轻微侵害。超过三分之二的儿童未因自由召回(邀请和暗示邀请)而披露违法行为。秘密指示在免费召回的早期增加了披露,但与提示性邀请结合使用时,并不比没有指示更好。是/否,专门询问有关违法行为的问题引起了几乎一半以前没有公开过的孩子的公开,而且错误警报很少见。 DYR问题导致很大比例的儿童,尤其是年幼儿童的回答模棱两可。研究结果突显了在没有直接问题的情况下引发违法披露的困难

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号