首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Carcass Persistence and Detectability: Reducing the Uncertainty Surrounding Wildlife-Vehicle Collision Surveys
【2h】

Carcass Persistence and Detectability: Reducing the Uncertainty Surrounding Wildlife-Vehicle Collision Surveys

机译:体的持久性和可检测性:减少周围野生动物与车辆碰撞调查的不确定性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Carcass persistence time and detectability are two main sources of uncertainty on roadkill surveys. In this study, we evaluate the influence of these uncertainties on roadkill surveys and estimates. To estimate carcass persistence time, three observers (including the driver) surveyed 114km by car on a monthly basis for two years, searching for wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVC). Each survey consisted of five consecutive days. To estimate carcass detectability, we randomly selected stretches of 500m to be also surveyed on foot by two other observers (total 292 walked stretches, 146 km walked). We expected that body size of the carcass, road type, presence of scavengers and weather conditions to be the main drivers influencing the carcass persistence times, but their relative importance was unknown. We also expected detectability to be highly dependent on body size. Overall, we recorded low median persistence times (one day) and low detectability (<10%) for all vertebrates. The results indicate that body size and landscape cover (as a surrogate of scavengers’ presence) are the major drivers of carcass persistence. Detectability was lower for animals with body mass less than 100g when compared to carcass with higher body mass. We estimated that our recorded mortality rates underestimated actual values of mortality by 2–10 fold. Although persistence times were similar to previous studies, the detectability rates here described are very different from previous studies. The results suggest that detectability is the main source of bias across WVC studies. Therefore, more than persistence times, studies should carefully account for differing detectability when comparing WVC studies.
机译:road体持续时间和可检测性是道路杀伤性调查不确定性的两个主要来源。在这项研究中,我们评估了这些不确定性对道路杀伤力调查和估计的影响。为了估计car体的持续时间,三名观察员(包括驾驶员)每月两次乘车调查114公里,以寻找野生动物与车辆的碰撞(WVC)。每个调查连续五天。为了估算car体的可检测性,我们随机选择了500m的一段,另外两名观察员也进行了徒步调查(总共292条步行段,146 km步行段)。我们预计the体的体型,道路类型,清除剂的存在和天气条件是影响the体持续时间的主要驱动力,但其相对重要性尚不清楚。我们还期望可检测性高度依赖于体型。总体而言,我们记录了所有脊椎动物的中值持续时间(一天)和低可检测性(<10%)低。结果表明,尸体的大小和景观覆盖度(作为清道夫的替代品)是car体持久性的主要驱动力。与体重较高的car体相比,体重小于100g的动物的可检测性较低。我们估计,我们记录的死亡率低估了死亡率的实际值2-10倍。尽管持续时间与以前的研究相似,但此处描述的可检出率与以前的研究有很大不同。结果表明,可检测性是WVC研究中偏差的主要来源。因此,在比较WVC研究时,除了持续时间以外,研究还应仔细考虑不同的可检测性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号