首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Effects of Promotion and Compunction Interventions on Real Intergroup Interactions: Promotion Helps but High Compunction Hurts
【2h】

Effects of Promotion and Compunction Interventions on Real Intergroup Interactions: Promotion Helps but High Compunction Hurts

机译:促进和Comp悔干预对真正的群体间互动的影响:促进帮助但造成的高伤害

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>HIGHLIGHTS We show the promotion intervention has positive effects during intergroup contact, but that high levels of compunction can have negative effects.Intergroup contact is probably the longest standing and most comprehensively researched intervention to reduce discrimination. It is also part of ordinary social experience, and a key context in which discrimination is played out. In this paper, we explore two additional interventions which are also designed to reduce discrimination, but which have not yet been applied to real intergroup interactions. The promotion intervention encourages participants to relax and enjoy an interaction, while the compunction intervention motivates participants to avoid discrimination. Across two studies, we tested the separate effects of promotion (Study 1) and then compunction (Study 2) on participants' interactions with a confederate whom they believed to have a history of schizophrenia. In Study 1, participants received either a promotion intervention to “relax and have an enjoyable dialogue” or no intervention (control; n = 67). In Study 2, participants completed a Single-Category Implicit Attitude Test before being told that they were high in prejudice (high compunction condition) or low in prejudice (low compunction condition; n = 62). Results indicated that promotion was associated with broadly positive effects: participants reported more positive experience of the interaction (enjoyment and interest in a future interaction), and more positive evaluations of their contact partner (increased friendliness and reduced stereotyping). There were no effects on participants' reported intergroup anxiety. In contrast, high compunction had broadly negative effects: participants reported more negative experiences of the interaction and more negative evaluations of their contact partner (using the same dependent measures outlined above). In addition, participants in the high compunction condition reported increased intergroup anxiety and increased self-anxiety (anxiety around thinking or doing something that is prejudiced). Participants in the high compunction condition also reported reduced expectancies of self-efficacy (i.e., they were less confident that they would be able to make a good impression).
机译:>亮点我们证明了促进干预在团体间接触中具有积极作用,但高水平的交往会产生负面影响。团体间接触可能是最长久且研究最全面的减少歧视的干预措施。这也是普通社会经验的一部分,也是歧视现象产生的关键环境。在本文中,我们探索了另外两种旨在减少歧视的干预措施,但这些干预措施尚未应用于真实的群体间互动。促进干预鼓励参与者放松和享受互动,而干预干预则鼓励参与者避免歧视。在两项研究中,我们分别测试了升职(研究1)和结comp(研究2)对参与者与他们认为患有精神分裂症的同盟者互动的影响。在研究1中,参与者接受了促进干预以“放松并进行愉快的对话”或没有干预(对照; n = 67)。在研究2中,参与者在被告知偏见高(高交往条件)或偏见低(低交往条件; n = 62)之前,完成了单类别内隐态度测试。结果表明,晋升与广泛的积极影响相关:参与者报告说,互动的互动体验更积极(对未来的互动充满兴趣和兴趣),而对联系伙伴的评价也更加积极(友善和刻板印象减少)。对参与者报告的组间焦虑没有影响。相比之下,高昂的交往产生了广泛的负面影响:参与者报告了互动的负面经历和对伴侣的负面评价(使用与上述相同的相关测评)。此外,高交往状态的参与者报告说,组际焦虑增加,自我焦虑增加(围绕思考或做有偏见的事情而产生的焦虑)。处于高竞争状态的参与者也报告了自我效能的期望降低(即,他们对自己能够留下良好印象的信心不足)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号